The Women of America Are Angry, And Rightfully So.

I’M AS MAD AS HELL, AND I’M NOT GOING TO TAKE THIS ANYMORE!’ I want you to get up right now, sit up, go to your windows, open them and stick your head out and yell – ‘I’m as mad as hell and I’m not going to take this anymore!’ Things have got to change. But first, you’ve gotta get mad!… You’ve got to say, ‘I’m as mad as hell, and I’m not going to take this anymore!’ Then we’ll figure out what to do about the depression and the inflation and the oil crisis. But first get up out of your chairs, open the window, stick your head out, and yell, and say it.”(Peter Finch as Howard Beale in the 1976 movie “Network”)

The women of America are angry in this election year, and rightfully so. And it’s not the professional “women’s advocates” this time; it is, for the lack of a better description, the “silent majority of women.”
It is women across the political spectrum. It is women who are single, or married or divorced. It is women who are homemakers and in the workforce or both. Women who are professionals, and merchants and factory workers. But mostly, it is women who are only tangentially interested in politics.

I learned from my friend Barbara Wilson who was, during my twenty years in the communications business, my client, my witness, my boss, and my colleague, that there are times to sit quietly and listen uncritically when looking for answers in unfamiliar territory. So I have been — listening that is — and last week, during a gathering of friends, the light came on about why women are angry about the political process.

I want you to meet a good friend of mine. Her name is Paula. She has been a working mother, and now a working grandmother, her whole adult life. She has raised three children — including a stint as a single mother after her divorce. She is now remarried to a man who can only be described as the “salt of the earth.” Most of her business career has been in the grocery industry and she has risen through the ranks, been “surplused” as the result of mergers, passed over in favor of men that she has had to subsequently train, hired, fired, promoted, lateraled and emjoyed many of the successes and suffered most of the indignities that employment imposes on all of us.

She is a registered independent. And Paula is mad as hell and she isn’t going to take it anymore.

Paula says that she tries to begin each day with the belief that things are balanced, equal, and that people will be judged by their performance and not some other criteria. For the most part Paula believes that is the case but she recognizes that often times life isn’t fair and she sees that in this year’s presidential selection process.

Paula’s anger began with the treatment of Sen. Hillary Clinton during the Democrat primary. There are few issues upon which Paula and Hillary Clinton would agree but Paula admired Hillary greatly for her courage, her work ethic, her abilities and her mental toughness. She felt that Hillary held herself back in 2004 in order to prove herself — to demonstrate by her work in the United States Senate that she had a command of the issues, a demonstrable policy agenda, and a record of success. Paula recognized a similar trait among working women who must prove themselves repeatedly before they are ever accepted as a peer. And Paula saw repeatedly the fact that nobody demanded a similar demonstration of competency from Sen. Barack Obama — a freshman senator with virtually no accomplishments by which he could be measured.

Her anger continued when she watched as the press and pundits critiqued Hillary for her dress, her hair styles, and her appearance. They made snide remarks about her preference for pantsuits speculating that they were designed to hide a large derriere. Her voice was shrill, her laugh was contrived, and she seemed to be “hard”, “brittle” and “calculating.” Nothing was ever said of Obama’s appearance. And in this she recognized experiences that she and other women executives had endured in their own careers. She remembered the tightrope they had all had to walk when, in meetings, they had to appear knowledgeable and decisive without being “overbearing.”

And Paula was dismayed as she watched as Hillary rolled out policies and positions, defended them, and held fast to them, while Obama was allowed to criticize them without having any policies of his own. She was particularly incensed that, in the end, Obama has adopted virtually all of Hillary’s policies and been accorded acclaim as if they were his own. Paula recognized the number of times that women have been passed over for promotion and been forced to train the persons who got it — to watch as the men take credit for the very ideas given them by these same women.

But the final indignity for Paula was that Obama did not even ask — did not even consider — Hillary for his running mate. The fact that Obama vetted scores of other potential running mates without doing the same for Hillary is viewed by Paula as the ultimate slap in the face. She recounts that John Kennedy picked Lyndon Johnson as a running mate because of his strong vote in the primaries. Ronald Reagan chose George H.W. Bush for the same reason. Neither was particularly fond of their choice but they recognized the importance of honoring those who supported their rivals.

It was an emotional day for Paula when Hillary suspended her campaign and conceded the nomination to Obama. She may have never voted for Hillary but she still admired her — and she was angry at the treatment she received.

But Paula went from angry to “mad as hell” in the aftermath of Sen. John McCain’s selection of Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate. The echo from the microphones had barely died before the press and pundits went after Palin with a vengeance. And, for Paula, it was the same thing all over again — they talked about Palin’s appearance (hair up or hair down), her husband, her family, and her life. They speculate about her ability to be a wife, mother and public official. The denigrated the fact that she is a product of small towns and rural states. They made jokes about the fact that she is a “hockey mom”, or that she is a hunter or that she fishes with her husband. Precious little time is devoted to her policies, her accomplishments or her career — all of which are superior in time and experience to those of Obama. In Paula’s words, “How can you argue about Sarah Palin’s qualifications if you are prepared to accept those of Barack Obama?”

Paula states that Sarah Palin doesn’t represent the values of the “women’s advocates” that have monopolized the political stage for so long. But, for Paula, she does seem to reflect the values of many women today who are primarily concerned with their families, with their nation’s security and with the prospects of a good job in a stable economy. And those, folks, are the issues that are near and dear to their hearts and they are sick and tired of watching those issues ignored while women candidates like Hillary and Sarah are denigrated for everything else but the issues.

Rep. Linda Flores once told me of a survey that indicated that women voters were “shoppers” as opposed to men who were “brand loyalists.” In other words, women seized upon issues that were important to them and migrated to candidates who reflected those views regardless of party affiliation while men tended to support their party’s candidate regardless of issues.

America’s politicians may be just about to get an education from the American women who are mad as hell and aren’t going to take it anymore.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn Post to Reddit

Posted by at 06:00 | Posted in Measure 37 | 6 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • Jerry

    I only hope the wacked out left keeps up these insane attacks on Sarah. They don’t even know that it is hurting them.

  • Crawdude

    According to the DNC, women shouldn’t strive for higher expectations. They should stay home and mind the homestead, let the men folk do the thinkin’.

    It only took the GOP to nominated a women for vice president to show the DNC for the sexists fascists that they are.

  • Bob Clark

    How come the press never talks of Nobama’s smoking habit? No pictures of him sneeking a drag. The Demo’s publicly ridicule smokers and try to tax them out of existence yet they nominate a smoker to be president. Just one more irony in the Demo’s platform and inconsistent actions.

    • dean

      You guys are hillarious. Its the year 2008, and Republicans have discovered feminism. I’m rolling in the aisles here. Please stop. Larry Huss as the defender of Hillary Clinton? “Insane” attacks on Sarah? like what….that she is a serial liar about giving Congress back the money for the bridge that she supported before she did not, and then she kept the money anyway?

      And CD….please. Of 13 women who are Senators, 10 are Democrats, 3 are Republicans. In the House, I counted 71 women, 50 of whom are Democrats. For governors, its 4 Dems, 3 Rs. Hillary got 18 million votes in the primaries. How many votes did any woman get in teh Republican primary? Lets see…..that would be zero.

      What’s next? Republicans are going to discover racism? Naw.

      Bob…on the smoking thing. I think Obama actually quit. But even if he is still sneaking a few puffs, who really cares? Economic policy, health insurance, foreign policy, energy….lots of big stuff to consider in this election. Who smokes or doesn’t is just not a rational basis for choosing a President, unles they are smoking weed, and even then, it is legal in Alaska, not Illinois.

  • NJ

    Palin is not pro-choice, has an energy policy that is simply drill, drill, drill, doesn’t support stem cell research, does not believe, and therefore will not support policies that attempt to control global warming (and even if global warming is not due to man’s activities, is there anything wrong with a cleaner environment? Is there an issue with preserving our wildlife and wild areas for our kids? What’s the problem with thinking and seeking better solutions for our energy needs?) These are not partisan issues. I will vote for the candidate who supports issues and polices that move America to energy independence through renewable, less polluting resources, wildlife conservation, and a decent foreign policy.

  • Anonymous

    “doesn’t support stem cell research”

    Why do liberals always create a false caricature on issue after issue.

    She doesn’t support using “embrios” for embrionic stem cell research.

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)