Costs of Utility Mandate Ultimately Borne by Consumers

By Eric Revell

With the passage of Senate Bill 838 by the Oregon legislature in 2007, most electric utilities in Oregon are required to provide certain levels of electricity from so-called renewable resources. The mandate is 15% of electricity from renewable sources by 2015, rising to a target of 25% in 2025.

In the event that a utility is unable to meet the renewable energy mandate with their own resources, they can purchase renewable energy certificates (RECs). RECs are not an actual source of electricity; they are simply trade-able certificates representing the “environmental amenities” of power generated from politically correct sources, such as windmills and biomass facilities. They can be sold by the power generator to a retail utility company in need as a stand-alone certificate, or they can be bundled with the electricity actually produced. Unused RECs can be banked and sold to achieve compliance with green energy requirements at a later date.

While there is nothing wrong with consumers purchasing a fake commodity like a REC of their own volition, the state legislature should not make utilities purchase them simply to comply with expensive green power mandates. The additional costs incurred from REC purchases are passed on to all consumers through higher rates, an encumbrance that will increase as the renewable energy benchmarks continue to rise.

Eric Revell is a research associate at Cascade Policy Institute, Oregon’s free market public policy research organization.

Learn more at cascadepolicy.org.

Posted by at 05:00 | Posted in Energy | Tagged , , , , | 13 Comments | Email This Post | Print This Post
  • valley person

    Costs of not having a renewable energy mandate ultimately borne by air breathers.

    • jim karlock

      Get real valley person (Dean Apostle)
      This is about making energy unaffordable for low income people.
      CO2 is NOT a pollutant, and there is NO evidence that it affects climate.
      Thanks
      JK

      • DavidAppell

        In fact, CO2 has been declared a pollutant by the US Supreme Court. And of course it affects climate. If CO2 were suddenly removed from the Earth’s atmosphere, average global temperature would drop about 28 C in just 10 years.

        • burp

          8 out 9 sublime juices agree with DA’s scientific anal’sis.

          • valley person

            Every scientific academy on teh planet agrees with DAs analysis.

          • Naysayer

            Does Chuck Wiese concur with your assininertion, VP?

        • jim karlock

          This from the guy that claimed Katrina was caused by CO2. But he probably hasn’t noticed that no hurricanes struck the USA for years afterwards.
          David is still unable to show that man’s CO2 is causing dangerous warming.
          Thanks
          JK

  • Rupert in Springfield

    Corporate welfare at its finest!

  • Bob Clark

    Costs of renewable energy are also borne by those having to view once golden hills just outside the eastern side of the Gorge and other places similar with a rather ugly mass of whirling like egg beaters, not to mention the bird kill.
    Nice thing about centralized plants, like natural gas fired generators, is they are concentrated and can be hidden away amongst cotton and other type trees (which actually help absorb some of the emissions). Even the Centralia, Washington, coal fired plant isn’t all that ruinous (in fact unless you’ve seen it, you wouldn’t even know it’s nearby in downtown Centrailia). Moreover, these type of conventional low cost electricity supplies make a higher rate of economic prosperity possible, by freeing capital and labor (government resources, too) to invent new ways of doing things; and many times this release of resources actually speeds energy efficiency and the steady evolution away from dirty energy sources.
    Oregon government as usual fixates on the cart and not the horse.

  • Oregon Engineer

    The stupid part of this whole conversation is that according to the legislation Hydropower is not a renewable energy source. What is not renuable?
    If you look at the make up of a European country such as Germany the bulk of their renuable power is guess what, Hydro-electric.

  • DavidAppell

    Since generating power with fossil fuels creates more damage than value, this will save a fair bit of money.

  • mike

    We must all share in the costs to save our mother, the earf.

    • DavidAppell

      The Earth will do fine. It’s about the people.

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)