“Free Speech” at Modesto Junior College Means “Take a Number”

ConstitutionFree speech is not allowed on the sidewalk at Modesto Junior College in California. Students must represent an official organization in order to pass out materials or engage in conversation with other students passing by. Even if what they want to distribute is just the U.S. Constitution.

Robert Van Tuinen proved this last week, when he gave out copies of the Constitution to fellow students in honor of Constitution Day. College employees notified Robert that students have to start an official club to engage in free speech on campus, and they must stand in the “free speech area.” Robert was welcome to engage in free speech there, but unfortunately it was mostly booked until October.

According to a FOX News report, Robert Shibley, senior vice president of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, “said the very idea of speech codes on campus ought to be troubling to Americans.” “They are imposed in an attempt to sanitize the public space of anything that might offend somebody,” he said. “The fact is, no school specifically needs a speech code….If people are too loud, harassing people, or blocking traffic, they have the means to address that.”

Hopefully, Robert Van Tuinen will plan ahead, and Modesto students will find him and his stack of Constitutions in the “free speech area” on Constitution Day next year. Maybe he could even arrange a group reading of the Bill of Rights.

Kathryn Hickok is Publications Director at Cascade Policy Institute, Oregon’s free market public policy research organization.

Learn more at cascadepolicy.org.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn Post to Reddit

Posted by at 05:00 | Posted in Bill of Rights | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • 3H

    What a stupid, useless, and unconstitutional rule. In a few weeks, there will be a story about how they had to change it.

    • .

      The Dems are coming to take US away in terms 3H approves, ha ha ho ho tally away.

  • pogden297

    The restriction on speech is blatantly unconstitutional. You can’t limit free speech on public property to certain speakers. While you can enact reasonable time, place, manner restrictions, they have to be very narrowly drawn. Having one small free speech area doesn’t begin to cut the muster. Does Modesta have an attorney on staff, at least one that took a constitutional law class?

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)