Local government changes community character when we allow it

Dave Berg thb Local government changes community character when we allow it

by Dave Berg

“Lettin’ the cat outta the bag is a whole lot easier ‘n puttin’ it back in” – Will Rogers

Twenty three years ago we moved to our community because it represented many of our core values. It was clear to us that the community character was represented by unique people and local institutions. The school system was excellent, the library was widely supported, and local government encouraged residents to invest in their properties, rather than burden them with fees and red tape. Low density uniquely typified our city in what is now often referred to as a “village” culture.

Back then the city focused its efforts on public safety, parks, and street projects versus expanding its influence in non essential areas. It just seemed to be a very well run city that had enormous support from its citizens. With its stellar reputation, it sure seemed to us to be very unique.

Over the past ten years we’ve seen dramatic shifts in these elements of community character, all initiated by local government. I began hearing about these changes five years ago from citizens who were telling me the library wasn’t necessarily the pillar of the community as it just didn’t meet their needs with its current distribution of services and the prominence of the internet. Two years later a new library bond, part of an urban renewal scheme, failed miserably. It was a symbol of community discontent.

The pillar of an unobtrusive local government has changed dramatically. It’s no secret that many residents now believe our local officials over reached their authority by trying to impose their agenda on our community. They continued to pass ordinances including those imposing restrictions on our property rights under the guise of environmental programs (“Sensitive lands”). They wasted millions on unused assets and studies like one for a new streetcar. At the same time they dramatically increased our fees and water rates to the point where they are now the second highest in the Portland area.

In the end though, the result of all this is simply that our former pillar of an unobtrusive local government was shattered. How? It was shattered by a well defined political ideology, coming from Portland and carried through by local officials. Spending, debt, restrictions on our property, and visions of light rail cars connected to massive apartment bunkers dominated the decisions of our officials. Many now ask did those officials have loyalty to our community or to a regional strategy imposed upon us? Given that several officials have moved from our community shortly after their term expired, I think we know the answer to that question.

Today the final pillar of a low density community is under attack. Despite electing several “fiscal conservatives” and terminating the streetcar charade, we find our officials paying for and promoting high density once again. Now, the question is will our citizens allow that final pillar to be taken down? If they do it will change our community character forever and we will just become another suburb of Portland.

Hopefully, residents will continue to engage and dissuade elected officials from making decisions which impose a new community character upon them. Good governance requires that officials act with the informed consent of the community. That’s something past administrations thought they could avoid. Thankfully they failed, but let’s see if this continues in Lake Oswego.

Our community can be an example of what to watch out for throughout Oregon. There were distinct signs we missed over the last decade. The lesson learned is the pillars of your community only remain strong when citizens support them through actions which ensure not only your institutions but also your elected officials don’t over extend their “allowed” authority.

Dave Berg is a 23-year resident of Lake Oswego a board member of COLA LO, Chair of the Lake Oswego Budget Committee, and Co-Chair of the Legislative Committee of the Clackamas County Republican Party

tt twitter big4 Local government changes community character when we allow it tt facebook big4 Local government changes community character when we allow it tt linkedin big4 Local government changes community character when we allow it tt reddit big4 Local government changes community character when we allow it

Posted by at 05:00 | Posted in Government Overreach, Government Regulation, Lake Oswego, Land Use Laws | 14 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • Bob Clark

    Government, like Metro, has such deep financial pockets with their own dedicated, guaranteed revenue stream it can pretty much spin any of its planning ideas so as to pressure the electorate into saying yes. The citizen initiative process has been the last bastion of hope in Oregon for countering government’s dominance. But even here, the initiative process has become corrupted, as Government either writes the ballot title or rewrites it to its liking. In elections, the Ballot Title is everything.

    The first step towards restoring a balance in governance in Oregon is to revise the Initiative process, such that for instance a randomly selected jury of individual citizens is charged with overseeing the Ballot Title writing. Judges can not be given full power over Ballot Titles as now, as most of them are either appointed into their positions and/or run largely unopposed in elections (orchestrated by a Lawyers’ guild).

    So, please let us work to restore Citizen say over Ballot Titles.

  • 3H

    “…and the prominence of the internet.”

    Yes, hide from the internet. That’s the best bet for a library. The Lake Oswego Public Library is still a pillar of the community. They’re just trying to serve all the needs of their patrons, not just the narrow demands of a few.

    • .

      Wail said by a michael mooreon!

      • 3H

        It comes as no surprise to me that you hate literacy.

        • LulzPdx

          Not just literacy. He/she hates God too.

          • .

            as for that assertion, untrue

        • .

          untrue

  • Dave Berg

    Actually 3H I am a big supporter of the library and always have been. So the comments I received starting 5 years ago were a bit of a surprise. The vote wasn’t though because local government mixed a core institution with urban renewal.

    • 3H

      But, you made the claim that the library isn’t a pillar of the community anymore. I think that assessment is wrong. No library, anywhere, makes every member of their community happy. Sometimes it’s because long time users don’t like the changes. It’s the library’s job to balance their needs with the needs of others who make need or like newer technologies. If the library freezes itself in time, they lose future patrons.

      I’m aware of why LOPL lost the levy; libraries don’t like being bundled for that reason.

  • Marie

    I am not sure we even need libraries anymore, which may be why others agreed and voted thumbs down!
    Get a job and buy your own books.

  • thevillageidiot

    With a median family income of 120K plus in LO the library most likely is not the pillar it once was. the majority of the residents probably have internet access to just about all the services that used to be provided by the library. for those that do not own a computer the library would continue to be the center for information. Unless the library has a significant meeting space for even small groups there would be reduce significance as a community meeting place. so as a community pillar it has probably lost that significance. Mr Berg said he is a supporter and I would guess there is a significant number in LO that are supporters but still do not view the library as a community pillar. Why should the library be a center for urban renewal. In small towns and lower income areas (in the neighborhood of 50k family income) the library may still have a major presence and still may be a pillar of the community.

    • wrathofkhan

      Let’s not forget that libraries have oodles of resources that often cannot be found online, or at least in any reasonable time due to the millions of websites for any subject. maps, research material etc is much easier to find at libraries than online.

  • Pingback: casey()

  • Pingback: Gerard()

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)