Oregon Continues Its Dismal Employment Slide

larryhuss.serendipityThumb Oregon Continues Its Dismal Employment Slide
When the January Oregon employment figures were released, they showed a slight uptick in total state employment — an improvement of about 1,100 jobs. Even the casual observer was skeptical given the visible signs of a continuing deep jobs recession. And sure enough the number was as phony as the administration charged with producing them.

In a March 10, 2010, press release the Oregon Department of Employment — a particularly misnamed agency — noted:

“New numbers for 2009 and prior show that Oregon’s unemployment topped out at 11.6 percent in May and June 2009 and payroll employment dropped by 82,800 jobs, or 4.9 percent, between December 2008 and December 2009. This means that Oregon’s unemployment rate wasn’t as high as the figures originally reported, which rose as high as 12.2 percent in May. That’s the good news. However, the payroll employment losses were worse than originally reported – the previously reported drop in payroll employment for the 12 months ending December 2009 was only 72,400 jobs or 4.3 percent.” [Emphasis supplied]

That’s right, the bean counters missed it by 10,400 jobs — 10,400 more Oregonians out of work than previously reported. That means, from peak employment in February of 2008 to the end of 2009, 159,000 Oregonians lost their jobs. And given the fact that during that same period of time, government employment actually increased by 3,500, the reality is that 162,500 Oregonians have lost their private sector jobs with no prospects for improvement in sight.

But it gets worse. The February 2010 jobs report showed an additional 1,200 jobs lost (erasing the 1,100 job gain reported for January). And despite the continuing job loss in Oregon’s private sector, Oregon state government continues to grow with the February report noting another 100 employees added to the state government payroll (which also means that the actual private sector job loss was 1,300).

From February of 2008 through February of 2010, Oregon has sustained a loss of 163,800 private sector jobs — that is an 11.3% loss of private sector jobs.

During Oregon’s last recession, Oregon lost nearly 66,000 jobs between peak employment in November of 2000 and the nadir in June of 2003. It took until December of 2004 to fully regain the 66,000 jobs lost.

This time the job loss is closing on three times as great and the decline much more rapid. How long it will take to recover those 163,800 private sector jobs lost? Given the track record of the Kitzhaber/Kulongoski administrations, Oregonians should expect a long climb out. And no help is forthcoming from the public employee unions dominated Democrat legislature. You can safely assume that the only progress to be made by them is annual salary increases, step increases and benefit increases for the public employees.

Oregon’s economic picture is so bleak that Washington, Idaho, Montana, and Chicago are actively recruiting Oregon businesses to relocate to their states. The Kulongoski administration’s singular economic effort continues to be the pursuit of the “green power” dream. Arizona has been routinely kicking Oregon’s derrière in the quest to locate solar power manufacturing. And Oregon’s nascent wind power industry will collapse when Oregon drops its heavy subsidization — a subsidization that has, to date, primarily benefit manufacturers located just about everywhere but Oregon.

So where does Oregon go from here? Let me reiterate four simple steps that will do more to improve Oregon’s economic picture than all of the “initiatives” undertaken by Oregon’s last three Democrat governors combined. Capital investment is the key to job growth. Diverting money available for capital investment into taxes stifles growth. Freeing money from taxes to be targeted for capital investment stimulates job growth. Each suggestion is targeted towards creating capital investment.

1. Eliminate the state inheritance tax for those portions of the estate that represent farms, ranches and businesses in Oregon. By doing so, Oregon government will not force family members to forego what would otherwise be investment capital in order to pay the taxes.
2. Create a tax free capital gains for all investments made for the next ten years and couple that with a reduction on capital gains tax to one-half of the current rates phased in over the next five years.
3. Accelerate depreciation schedules for all capital investments made to at least equal those utilized under federal income tax laws.
4. Create a tax credit for one-half of the amount that wages exceed federal minimum wage standards for each new job created from January 1, 2010 2009 until January 1, 2012.

And if you are worried about revenue neutrality for state government, any temporary reduction in tax revenue can be offset by the following reductions in state spending.

1. Stop making the employees contribution to PERS thus reducing state payments to PERS by six percent. (Oh, you didn’t know that the state was making the payments for the public employees and then matching that amount — thank your local public employee unions and their massive campaign contributions.)
2. Cap the amount of state contribution to employee healthcare at the average private employer contribution level in the state. According to the Kaiser Family Health website, that amount is about $9288 or $774 per month. Oregon currently pays between $1300 and $1500 per month per employee. (Thank your local public employee unions and their massive campaign contributions.)
3. Freeze state employee salaries, including step increases, until the average salary of state government employees equals that of the state’s private sector employees. (Oh, you thought that the state’s public employees earn less than the private sector because they have better job security. Not so — excluding their generous benefits package, public employees, according to Oregon’s Department of Employment, make one-third more than their private sector counterparts — at least those private sector employees that still have a job. Thank your local public employee unions and their massive campaign contributions.)

But don’t hold your breath that any of these proposals will be adopted. Oregon’s government is in the firm control of Oregon’s public employee unions and their wellbeing is not only paramount, it is singular.

tt twitter big4 Oregon Continues Its Dismal Employment Slide tt digg big4 Oregon Continues Its Dismal Employment Slide tt facebook big4 Oregon Continues Its Dismal Employment Slide tt reddit big4 Oregon Continues Its Dismal Employment Slide

Posted by at 06:00 | Posted in Measure 37 | 10 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • Bob Clark

    Death by union control can be a slow, melancholy process as illustrated by the Detroit Auto industry’s

    death by union strangulation of host…management gave in to the union bureaucracy early on and only GM

    selling off key assets kept the industry alive for decades. Bama’s and Dems’ printing more fiat currency to

    extend unemployment benefits for up to two years reduces incentive for folks to be productive, not to

    mention Oregon’s relatively high income tax and free government healthcare fund. Reward the

    unproductive and penalize the productive…yes this is a real winning strategy. Not!

    Green Oregon turns to moss.

  • Outlaw the PEU!

    Yes, yes yes the Public employees can distroy Oregon…yes you lazy pigs (ref Animal Farm) can.

    • Rupert in Springfield

      Wow Dean – you are still chafing that you were ignorant of a basic literary reference when I said you are a “Napoleon is always right” kind of guy?

      You know, maybe if you spent more time actually thinking about your argument rather than trying to come up with insults you would come off a little better on here.

      This case is a perfect example right – The pigs were the depots in Animal Farm. They were the ones insisting everyone else was lazy, not the other way around. So your attempt here is pretty flawed.

      Maybe try actually reading the book before trying a literary reference?

      Or better yet, maybe try actually thinking about a constructive argument to support your position instead of just the usual diatribe of lame insults and topic shifting excuses.

      • valley p

        Sorry Rupert. Wrong once again. That was not my post.

        If you spent more time being less sure of yourself despite lack of empirical evidence then I might insult you less often.

        “Maybe try actually reading the book before trying a literary reference?”

        Two Rupert wrongs do not make a Rupert right. I told you the other day that I had read Animal Farm, but 40 years ago. Should we go over your reading or memory skill problem? Your choice.

        OK. So yesterday I said you make an average of 6 errors a day. here it is still morning and you are up to 2. Plenty of time left in the old day Rupert. Get to work.

        • Rupert in Springfield

          Classless to the end Dean.

        • Can’t hide

          It was obviously your post, idiot!

        • Duh

          It was obviously your post!

  • Pingback: ichoosethin.com

  • Pingback: ichoosethin.com

  • eagle eye

    As for revenue, suggestion (1) is thoroughly illegal and has already been through the courts; (2) would take a battle royal with the unions. OK, elect all those attractive Republican candidates, take over the Governor’s office and both houses, and prepare to smash the unions. Ditto (3) and it would be ruinous for occupations where Oregon salaries are not relatively high. If you froze them long enough to bring state salaries in line with private salaries — who knows if we’re comparing apples to oranges, but let that pass — the salaries of many job categories would be hopelessly uncompetitive, especially in the professional areas.

    • retired UO science prof

      Correct on (3). I guarantee if they froze the already-low faculty salaries long enough to accomplish what Huss suggests, it would wreck the public universities.

      If this is an example of his managerial “talent”, Qwest is doing well to have Larry pensioned off.

  • SactCat

    The fundamental problem is for the last 20 years both Democrats and Republicans are trying and spectacular failing us by micromanaging the job market. Both call for subsidizing a narrow segment of the market while the rest goes to pot. Then finally the very market they subsidized goes bust.

    This happen with high tech manufacturing, bio-tech and will happen with so called green manufacturing jobs. My prediction is Solar World will eventually go bust wen government subsidize solar power dries up.
    A better plan is only concentrate on the macro of making business friendly and attract a very wide range of white and blue collar entrepreneurs from small businesses to large corporate headquarters.

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)