Reclaim Oregon’s Forests: We Can Manage

forestlease014s.serendipityThumb Reclaim Oregons Forests: We Can ManageBy Ben Shelton

Federal ownership of Oregon’s forests has failed. Oregon, like other Western states, has relied on federal agencies to manage the majority of its land. But it is now clear this century-long experiment has crippled our forests and rural communities. In spite of these hardships, federal bureaucrats add insult to injury with reports like the one released in late July by the Western Oregon Task Force, which offered “too little, too late,” according to Oregon’s congressional delegation. If Oregonians want this to change, we must abandon our deep-rooted faith in federal agencies, reclaim our forests, and manage what is ours.

The federal government owns 18.2 million acres of Oregon’s 30 million acres of forestland. A recent study released by the Oregon Forest Resources Institute points out that many of these forests are “sick and require immediate help.” Many are overcrowded and subject to devastating fires and insect infestations. Add to this The Oregonian reported in June that the Spotted Owl population continues to drop, despite 20 years on the endangered species list. In addition to environmental concerns, once-thriving rural communities now rely on the uncertain arrival of federal timber payments to fund essential services. Meanwhile, Congress and the responsible federal agencies remain gridlocked amid competing special interests with no incentive to improve the system or to cede land back to local authority.

The federal ownership experiment began 100 years ago and was flawed from its beginning. In a wave of good-willed progressive politics, Americans abandoned the constitutional practice of entrusting territorial lands to new states and settlers in response to land fraud and corruption. Instead of seeking better law enforcement and honest land distributions, President Theodore Roosevelt crafted a new policy that put huge amounts of unsettled landscapes in federal hands.

Oregonians affirmed the plan without hesitation. A 1907 article in The Oregonian summarized the hope: “The forestry policy of the National Government, more popularly known as President Roosevelt’s forest policy, is all that stands in the way of ultimate annihilation of the American forests.” This opinion prevailed across Oregon.

Now, some are questioning that logic and realizing that Oregonians have the ability, and should have the responsibility, to take care of all our forests. In 2005, the Oregon Legislature acknowledged the problems in federal forests and urged the Oregon Department of Forestry to address the issue. As a result, the Federal Forestland Advisory Committee was created. In 2008, after three years of collaboration, the Committee proclaimed the critical need for local action and decision making to sustain a healthy forest system. Despite these findings, 60% of Oregon’s forests remain locked in federal control beyond the reach of local management.

Most Oregonians listen apathetically to this narrative, if they listen at all. Some listen but still choose to support federal ownership out of habit or special interest. But if we sincerely want to preserve our forests, wildlife and rural communities, these attitudes must change. We need to bring decisions about Oregon’s forests back to Oregon – back to the people who live among the landscapes of this state.


Ben Shelton is a research associate at Cascade Policy Institute, Oregon’s free market public policy research organization.

tt twitter big4 Reclaim Oregons Forests: We Can Manage tt digg big4 Reclaim Oregons Forests: We Can Manage tt facebook big4 Reclaim Oregons Forests: We Can Manage tt reddit big4 Reclaim Oregons Forests: We Can Manage

Posted by at 06:00 | Posted in Measure 37 | 4 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • a retired professor

    Go ahead and dream about the federal government ceding ownership of the national forests. Perhaps the state, flush as it is with money, will make an offer the feds can’t refuse? Or perhaps private interests will prevail on the American people to sell their forests? Perhaps they will convince the nation to repeal the endangered species act? The private forests have a great record of restoring the population of spotted owls (and other threatened and endangered species). Surely when they learn of this success, the American people will want to privatize the restoration of species. Right?

    The fact is, there is no desire whatsoever at the national level to sell off the national forests. Let alone give them away, as some here no doubt would urge. It was a fantasy back in the Reagan days — 30 years ago, when James Watt made his buffoonish appearance on the national stage — and it’s even more of a fantasy now.

    Why not focus energy on more realistic efforts, like closing the public schools and repealing social security and medicare?

  • Pingback: welcomecareers.com

  • Paul Revere

    If we do not have viable strong local leaders we can not do the right thing. The right thing to do is to realize to ones self that the fed is dead to the people. Try it yourself, name one thing that the fed has done that was a sucess. Now name all of the federal programs the have failed. Kind of heavy on that side isn’t it.
    The right thing to do to save our way of life and property is to take back what is ours. Take control of our future. Condem all federal lands and return them to the people. Throw the feds out and forclose on them. Like any other dead beat just do the right thing.
    Secondly stop the eco nazis and activist judges in there tracks and bar the constant lawsuits and waste of billions of dollars. We waste billions to save the (snail darter) fill in the name of your choice. There is nothing wrong with conservation but if a species is doomed so be it.

    • Anonymous

      A secessionist, eh? Didn’t they teach you what happened in the Civil War when they tried that? Were you around when Eisenhower sent federal troops to Little Rock (and was ready to occupy the entire South, if necessary, to enforce the Supreme Court desegregation ruling)?

      Too bad, Paul, the fake hero act won’t cut it.

  • Pingback: wwwcancer.co.uk

  • valley p

    “The federal ownership experiment began 100 years ago and was flawed from its beginning.”

    Federal ownership began right after the Revolutionary war when the original federal government came into possession of all the land west of the Appalachians and east of the Mississippi River. The Louisiana Purchase and Mexican-American Wars completed the federal estate to the west coast. The ensuing 200 plus years encouraged westward settlement by clearing the native inhabitants, selling the land to finance government, and subsidizing the railroads. The land that the Federal government decided to keep in Forest Reserves as of 1893 was the too rugged, to dry, or too inaccessible and no one could farm it profitably. Plus, the private sector timber industry had established a 100 year history of forest devastation. Read George Perkins Marsh to see what a mess they created.

    So now you want to take us back over 100 years and undo the national forests, parks, and wilderness areas? Good luck with that program. I think you will encounter a bit of opposition.

  • Pingback: blog.car101guide.info

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)