Buying 2 cents for $3 million: Silly or sound?

Michelle Cole from the Oregonian wrote Monday about the $3 million the Department of Human Services is shelling out to buy advice from a California consultant. The story is a little cynical on the expenditure:

The Oregon Department of Human Services is spending $3.2 million to hire a California consultant to help the state’s largest bureaucracy figure out how to do its job.

It represents a small fraction of the $12 billion two-year budget. But the expenditure has raised a few eyebrows among advocates for the agency’s clients — a large proportion of whom are poor, elderly or children.

Of course, the knee jerk reaction is to come down on DHS for burning through $3 million that could be going to services for the state’s needy and disadvantaged. But if we expect DHS to be running more effectively and efficiently, can we really begrudge them the tools they need to get the job done?

Bruce Goldberg, director of DHS, promises big returns on the expenditure:

Bruce Goldberg, the department’s director, said he’s certain that the consultants will help the department save at least $3.2 million by helping to identify efficiencies.

He’s labeled the process the “DHS Transformation Initiative.”

“What we get out of it is going to make us much better,” Goldberg said. “And the return on that investment is going to be, I think, dramatic. And it doesn’t happen unless you make that investment.”

Is this a smart move that makes business sense and will yield cost savings in state government, or another example of government spending gone amuck?

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn Post to Reddit

Posted by at 06:00 | Posted in Measure 37 | 4 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • Jerry

    I vote gone amuck! Maybe they can pass a state constitutional amendment to lock in funding for such worthwhile projects.

  • DMF

    Sounds like a heck of a good idea. Do you think it will make DHS any smarter. I don’t think so, you have to have brains to get smarter.

  • Steve Plunk

    There are numerous problems with hiring outside consultants. There are no guarantees of value. Consulting firms are a refuge for retired government bureaucrats double dipping society who often give jobs to those who hired them earlier. Most importantly, why are we hiring consultants when people like Bruce Goldberg should be doing the job? That’s what we are paying him for.

    The steadily expanding use of outside consultants is a soft corruption of our government. The sooner we recognize that the more money we will save.

    • CRAWDUDE

      Good point, I noticed most of the former disgraced county commisioners end up as county “consultants”. I’m hoping (boy blunder) Erik Sten isn’t re-elected next time he run……….. I’m willing to bet he gets a consulting job if he isn’t.

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)