This latest national attention is on Oregon’s Labor Commissioner, Brad Avakian, who is now running for Oregon Secretary of State.
Yesterday, Forbes Magazine wrote about Avakian – “a powerful state commissioner” – who “acts as if rules are only for other people.”
The Forbes article reveals “Public records show that Avakian has a ‘compliance for thee, but not for me’ attitude. Avakian enjoys cracking down on the private sector but is flagrantly mixing public and campaign funds and functions as he tries to move-up to Secretary of State in this election cycle.”Continue reading →
by Cascade Policy Institute Monday, October 24. 2016
— Why You Should Vote Down Metro’s Natural Area Levy
By John A. Charles, Jr. and Allison Coleman
In 2006, the Metro Council submitted to the voters a general obligation bond measure in the amount of $227.4 million to fund natural area acquisition. The measure was approved.
In a little-noticed appendix to Resolution No. 06-367A, the Metro Council stated that greenway lands acquired with bond funds would be land-banked with limited maintenance beyond initial site stabilization and possible habitat restoration. The Council noted that it had the financial means to carry out this promise:
“Once the 2006 Natural Areas Bond Measure is approved by voters, Metro will commit existing excise taxes to this basic level of maintenance, with Metro having sufficient resources currently to manage the newly acquired properties in this manner for a period of approximately ten (10) years.”
If the phrase “existing excise taxes” seems puzzling, there’s a reason; almost no one remembers that in 2002, the Metro Council enacted a garbage tax of one dollar/ton for the specific purpose of funding operations and maintenance (O&M) of parks. That amount was raised to $2.50/ton in 2004. Between 2002 and 2015, the garbage tax brought in $46,789,044 for Metro parks. Continue reading →
Oregon’s Democrat leadership has demonstrated resolute determination to implement policies under the guise of protecting our environment that are tantamount to social engineering. Examples are numerous.
During the 2015 legislative session, the controversial Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) was enacted. Again in 2016, the so-called “Coal to Clean” bill was passed and signed into law by Governor Kate Brown.
These kind of policies are not new to Oregon. Citizens in other nations whose leaders have decided to take them down a similar path are finding the costs prohibitive while the benefits are not measurable. We can expect similar policies will have little, if any, environmental benefits for Oregonians, while causing significant negative economic consequences. Continue reading →
As of late, stories have suggested that Measure 97 — the tax on Oregon sales — will be close in the end. I don’t think it will actually be that close. Yes on 97 has led for most of the campaign but the latest numbers suggest to me that No on 97 has taken a small but commanding lead. I also think that they will continue to expand that lead in the three weeks before Election Day.
It’s disappointing that my main opponent has run a campaign short on ideas and long on negative attacks. With each new endorsement I’ve received, his attacks have become more shrill, and misleading.
I have tried to run a very positive, solutions-based campaign because I believe voters are looking for a leader who has a plan to help Oregon families.
Newspapers across Oregon all agree. Every paper that has issued an endorsement has said I am the only candidate who will bring the necessary skills and integrity to the office of Secretary of State. Continue reading →
Oregon’s top marginal corporate income tax rate is the 18th highest in the nation.
On a revenue per capita basis, Oregon’s corporate income tax is the 28th highest.
The Foundation’s State Business Tax Climate Index ranks Oregon 37th nationally for overall corporate income tax structure.
The “dead last” corporate tax claim relies on two national reports (AEG, COST) that look at total business tax burdens, not just the tax burdens of large C corporations, the only entities directly targeted by Measure 97. Even so, both these reports make clear that they rate Oregon’s business tax burden low not because corporate taxes are low, but rather because Oregon doesn’t have a sales tax. Continue reading →