<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Oregon Catalyst</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oregoncatalyst.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oregoncatalyst.com</link>
	<description>Oregon Political News and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Republicans: Distracted from the Real Issues by Bored</title>
		<link>http://oregoncatalyst.com/15113-republicans-distracted-real-issues.html#comment-68333</link>
		<dc:creator>Bored</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregoncatalyst.com/?p=15113#comment-68333</guid>
		<description>Message to candidates - It&#039;s the economy stupids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Message to candidates &#8211; It&#8217;s the economy stupids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Republicans: Distracted from the Real Issues by David Appell</title>
		<link>http://oregoncatalyst.com/15113-republicans-distracted-real-issues.html#comment-68332</link>
		<dc:creator>David Appell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregoncatalyst.com/?p=15113#comment-68332</guid>
		<description>Canadian oil is in tar sands and doesn&#039;t require &quot;fracking.&quot; Only 10% of it is recoverable at current prices, which is 170 Bb or 10 yrs of US consumption. And it isn&#039;t ours, but sold on the world market. 

Last month the NHTSA said that &quot;based on the available data, NHTSA does not believe that Chevy Volts or other electric vehicles pose a greater risk of fire than gasoline-powered vehicles.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canadian oil is in tar sands and doesn&#8217;t require &#8220;fracking.&#8221; Only 10% of it is recoverable at current prices, which is 170 Bb or 10 yrs of US consumption. And it isn&#8217;t ours, but sold on the world market. </p>
<p>Last month the NHTSA said that &#8220;based on the available data, NHTSA does not believe that Chevy Volts or other electric vehicles pose a greater risk of fire than gasoline-powered vehicles.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Republicans: Distracted from the Real Issues by JoelinPDX</title>
		<link>http://oregoncatalyst.com/15113-republicans-distracted-real-issues.html#comment-68331</link>
		<dc:creator>JoelinPDX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregoncatalyst.com/?p=15113#comment-68331</guid>
		<description>What are you smoking VP, I bet it&#039;s strong stuff.

1) The national economy isn&#039;t improving. Housing is still underwater and unemployment is understated by a factor of about three. The stock market has absolutely no bearing on what&#039;s happening on Main Street. It is approaching three-quarters institutional investors.

2) Your opinion. You have nothing but your liberal beliefs to tell you that deficit spending is necessary.

3) Cute...but we shouldn&#039;t default on our bonds whether we want to or not.

4) Santorum may think the government belongs in the bedroom but Santorum isn&#039;t the entirety of the Republican Party.

5)  See point 4.

6) More and more scientists are looking at the facts and deciding that MMGW is untrue. According to Pew 49 percent of us believe it is natural or not due to man made causes while only 41 percent believe it is man made. Sorry VP. looks like your opinion is wrong on this one.

7) Who doesn&#039;t care about the condition of the environment? Stupid statement. As covered in point 6, Americans don&#039;t blame man for environmental problems with the atmosphere.

8) Yes, Obozo is personally well liked but politically he is still under 50 percent and as gasoline prices hit four or five dollars a gallon this summer, I&#039;m guessing his political likes will drop back below 40 percent.

9) Yes, Obozo professes to be a Christian (his problem) and only Orly Taitz still believes he was born in Kenya. As for being a socialist, he does keep showing his love for European style socialism and government.

10) Supporting charter schools doesn&#039;t make you a foe of public education. In fact, last I checked charter schools are public schools. As far as tax credits for private school tuition are concerned. Firstly, students attending private schools save public schools the cost of educating them and, secondly private schools are popular among the minorities in the big eastern cities because they provide kids with a better education than they get in the public schools.

11) Yep, absolutely true but Americans also believe unequivocally that we should reduce the size of the federal government and the federal workforce. So, basically Americans are torn on the issue, they believe that someone else should pay the taxes and that taxes shouldn&#039;t be raised to fund federal overspending.

12) We have a 100 year plus supply of natural gas and a 100 year supply of domestic oil (when you count Canadian &quot;fracked&quot; oil and ANWR and this doesn&#039;t include the oil in the upper mid-west where estimnates go as high as a 100 year supply.) So, to say the supply is limited is just a bit disingenuous. What it does say is we have 100 years to develop an electric car that, unlike the Obozo funded Volt, doesn&#039;t self-immolate and goes more than 35 miles on a charge.

Yes, we have problems that need to be addressed chief among them the economy and unemployment. But I notice you conveniently omitted those problems. Probably because Obozo, Harry Greed and Nancy Pelousy have no solutions for them. It&#039;s time that we gave someone else a chance rather than the inept Jerk-in-Chief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you smoking VP, I bet it&#8217;s strong stuff.</p>
<p>1) The national economy isn&#8217;t improving. Housing is still underwater and unemployment is understated by a factor of about three. The stock market has absolutely no bearing on what&#8217;s happening on Main Street. It is approaching three-quarters institutional investors.</p>
<p>2) Your opinion. You have nothing but your liberal beliefs to tell you that deficit spending is necessary.</p>
<p>3) Cute&#8230;but we shouldn&#8217;t default on our bonds whether we want to or not.</p>
<p>4) Santorum may think the government belongs in the bedroom but Santorum isn&#8217;t the entirety of the Republican Party.</p>
<p>5)  See point 4.</p>
<p>6) More and more scientists are looking at the facts and deciding that MMGW is untrue. According to Pew 49 percent of us believe it is natural or not due to man made causes while only 41 percent believe it is man made. Sorry VP. looks like your opinion is wrong on this one.</p>
<p>7) Who doesn&#8217;t care about the condition of the environment? Stupid statement. As covered in point 6, Americans don&#8217;t blame man for environmental problems with the atmosphere.<br />
 <img src='http://oregoncatalyst.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> Yes, Obozo is personally well liked but politically he is still under 50 percent and as gasoline prices hit four or five dollars a gallon this summer, I&#8217;m guessing his political likes will drop back below 40 percent.</p>
<p>9) Yes, Obozo professes to be a Christian (his problem) and only Orly Taitz still believes he was born in Kenya. As for being a socialist, he does keep showing his love for European style socialism and government.</p>
<p>10) Supporting charter schools doesn&#8217;t make you a foe of public education. In fact, last I checked charter schools are public schools. As far as tax credits for private school tuition are concerned. Firstly, students attending private schools save public schools the cost of educating them and, secondly private schools are popular among the minorities in the big eastern cities because they provide kids with a better education than they get in the public schools.</p>
<p>11) Yep, absolutely true but Americans also believe unequivocally that we should reduce the size of the federal government and the federal workforce. So, basically Americans are torn on the issue, they believe that someone else should pay the taxes and that taxes shouldn&#8217;t be raised to fund federal overspending.</p>
<p>12) We have a 100 year plus supply of natural gas and a 100 year supply of domestic oil (when you count Canadian &#8220;fracked&#8221; oil and ANWR and this doesn&#8217;t include the oil in the upper mid-west where estimnates go as high as a 100 year supply.) So, to say the supply is limited is just a bit disingenuous. What it does say is we have 100 years to develop an electric car that, unlike the Obozo funded Volt, doesn&#8217;t self-immolate and goes more than 35 miles on a charge.</p>
<p>Yes, we have problems that need to be addressed chief among them the economy and unemployment. But I notice you conveniently omitted those problems. Probably because Obozo, Harry Greed and Nancy Pelousy have no solutions for them. It&#8217;s time that we gave someone else a chance rather than the inept Jerk-in-Chief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sen. Peter Courtney tries to kill CHL privacy bill by guest</title>
		<link>http://oregoncatalyst.com/15158-sen-peter-courtney-kill-chl-privacy-bill.html#comment-68330</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregoncatalyst.com/?p=15158#comment-68330</guid>
		<description>Peter principle Corkney should be pie effaced and placed on gurneys before the sun sets on his arrears. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter principle Corkney should be pie effaced and placed on gurneys before the sun sets on his arrears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sen. Peter Courtney tries to kill CHL privacy bill by Bill Post</title>
		<link>http://oregoncatalyst.com/15158-sen-peter-courtney-kill-chl-privacy-bill.html#comment-68329</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Post</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregoncatalyst.com/?p=15158#comment-68329</guid>
		<description>Lemme give you a little more &quot;inside&quot; the shenanigans at the State Legislature.  When Sen. Prozanski and Rep. Thatcher had made the agreement posted above at about 4:50 Tuesday (the deadline to move to a committee was 5pm) they both assumed that the bill would be sent to the Judiciary Committee and Sen. Prozanski, with the amendment, would move it on.  So, why would Senate President Peter Courtney move it to Rules then?  My sources tell me that with Diane Rosenbaum and Ginny Burdick, both very anti-gun (though by his own admission, Prozanski told me personally he did not consider this a &quot;gun bill&quot; but rather a &quot;privacy bill&quot;), these two anti-gun Senators are also very highly interested in the Senate Presidency and are looking for ANY mistake by Courtney in order for a &quot;power grab&quot; to be made.  He knows that and he complied with these two Senator&#039;s desire.  Unbelievable and completely spineless.  This bill was sent to Judiciary Committee both of the last two sessions, so why else would it be different this time?  What a crock!  Keep up the pressure, privacy concerned citizens! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lemme give you a little more &#8220;inside&#8221; the shenanigans at the State Legislature.  When Sen. Prozanski and Rep. Thatcher had made the agreement posted above at about 4:50 Tuesday (the deadline to move to a committee was 5pm) they both assumed that the bill would be sent to the Judiciary Committee and Sen. Prozanski, with the amendment, would move it on.  So, why would Senate President Peter Courtney move it to Rules then?  My sources tell me that with Diane Rosenbaum and Ginny Burdick, both very anti-gun (though by his own admission, Prozanski told me personally he did not consider this a &#8220;gun bill&#8221; but rather a &#8220;privacy bill&#8221;), these two anti-gun Senators are also very highly interested in the Senate Presidency and are looking for ANY mistake by Courtney in order for a &#8220;power grab&#8221; to be made.  He knows that and he complied with these two Senator&#8217;s desire.  Unbelievable and completely spineless.  This bill was sent to Judiciary Committee both of the last two sessions, so why else would it be different this time?  What a crock!  Keep up the pressure, privacy concerned citizens!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dems block repeal of Measure 67 tax by Morris Saltikoff</title>
		<link>http://oregoncatalyst.com/14940-dems-block-repeal-measure-67-tax.html#comment-68328</link>
		<dc:creator>Morris Saltikoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregoncatalyst.com/?p=14940#comment-68328</guid>
		<description>so put them back on welfare or keep them holdin a shovel </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so put them back on welfare or keep them holdin a shovel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lars Larson: Obama violates religious beliefs by guest</title>
		<link>http://oregoncatalyst.com/15104-lars-larson-obama-violates-religious-beliefs.html#comment-68327</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregoncatalyst.com/?p=15104#comment-68327</guid>
		<description>The population bomb is everybody&#039;s baby - so KPIP, sheltering right minded whilst reconsigning all dose left of US wangers, mooselims and golden calf occupiers, eat al, to an Orwellian animal farm to fodder each udder until they can no longer Jane Cease and desist.    </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The population bomb is everybody&#8217;s baby &#8211; so KPIP, sheltering right minded whilst reconsigning all dose left of US wangers, mooselims and golden calf occupiers, eat al, to an Orwellian animal farm to fodder each udder until they can no longer Jane Cease and desist.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dems block repeal of Measure 67 tax by easydog</title>
		<link>http://oregoncatalyst.com/14940-dems-block-repeal-measure-67-tax.html#comment-68326</link>
		<dc:creator>easydog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregoncatalyst.com/?p=14940#comment-68326</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand people who don&#039;t want to pay taxes but expect other people to pay more!  I believe we need to get rid of our currant tax system and all the entitlements, bailouts and substities! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand people who don&#8217;t want to pay taxes but expect other people to pay more!  I believe we need to get rid of our currant tax system and all the entitlements, bailouts and substities! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Republicans: Distracted from the Real Issues by Rupert in Springfield</title>
		<link>http://oregoncatalyst.com/15113-republicans-distracted-real-issues.html#comment-68325</link>
		<dc:creator>Rupert in Springfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregoncatalyst.com/?p=15113#comment-68325</guid>
		<description>
&gt;So you have to go back nearly 20 years to find a time you were &quot;successful&quot;?

Nope, I just gave two examples. I could have also cited 2010, but that was due less to any notable Republican strategy than disgust with BO policies. 

What is it with liberals where someone gives an example or two and you guys instantly jump to this losing strategy of thinking an example or two is meant as an exhaustive survey of the issue?
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;So you have to go back nearly 20 years to find a time you were &#8220;successful&#8221;?</p>
<p>Nope, I just gave two examples. I could have also cited 2010, but that was due less to any notable Republican strategy than disgust with BO policies. </p>
<p>What is it with liberals where someone gives an example or two and you guys instantly jump to this losing strategy of thinking an example or two is meant as an exhaustive survey of the issue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Republicans: Distracted from the Real Issues by valley person</title>
		<link>http://oregoncatalyst.com/15113-republicans-distracted-real-issues.html#comment-68324</link>
		<dc:creator>valley person</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 20:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregoncatalyst.com/?p=15113#comment-68324</guid>
		<description>The title of this post should be: Republicans, Distracted From Reality. Let me count the ways:

1) The national economy is rapidly improving, unemployment is dropping, the stock market has recovered it lost value.
2) Deficit spending (short term) is necessary for it to continue to improve
3) The US is not Greece, and we only default on our bonds if we decide to.
4) Americans don&#039;t want government in our bedrooms
5) Americans (98%) actually think birth control is a good idea
6) The earth is warming due to fossil fuel emissions, and most Americans agree
7) Most Americans care about the condition of the environment 
8) Obama is well liked by the American public
9) He is not a secret Muslim, was born in the US, and is not a socialist
10) Most Americans support public education
11) Most Americans are not rich, and support taxing rich people at higher rates
12) Fossil fuels are called that for a reason. (Hint, supply is limited). 

There are actual problems that need to be addressed. Global competitiveness, improving education outcomes, getting people to save more for retirement and emergencies, transportation, energy, housing market recovery, manufacturing, preventing another financial meltdown.....

Now if Republicans accepted the above as reality, and focused on actual problems, they could construct a conservative leaning politics that responds. This would lead them to nominate someone with workable solutions to real problems that don&#039;t necessarily mean top down government, but that sometimes do mean that. In other words, pragmatism over ideology. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The title of this post should be: Republicans, Distracted From Reality. Let me count the ways:</p>
<p>1) The national economy is rapidly improving, unemployment is dropping, the stock market has recovered it lost value.<br />
2) Deficit spending (short term) is necessary for it to continue to improve<br />
3) The US is not Greece, and we only default on our bonds if we decide to.<br />
4) Americans don&#8217;t want government in our bedrooms<br />
5) Americans (98%) actually think birth control is a good idea<br />
6) The earth is warming due to fossil fuel emissions, and most Americans agree<br />
7) Most Americans care about the condition of the environment  <img src='http://oregoncatalyst.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> Obama is well liked by the American public<br />
9) He is not a secret Muslim, was born in the US, and is not a socialist<br />
10) Most Americans support public education<br />
11) Most Americans are not rich, and support taxing rich people at higher rates<br />
12) Fossil fuels are called that for a reason. (Hint, supply is limited). </p>
<p>There are actual problems that need to be addressed. Global competitiveness, improving education outcomes, getting people to save more for retirement and emergencies, transportation, energy, housing market recovery, manufacturing, preventing another financial meltdown&#8230;..</p>
<p>Now if Republicans accepted the above as reality, and focused on actual problems, they could construct a conservative leaning politics that responds. This would lead them to nominate someone with workable solutions to real problems that don&#8217;t necessarily mean top down government, but that sometimes do mean that. In other words, pragmatism over ideology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

