Columbia River Water Next Export to California

river.serendipityThumb Columbia River Water Next Export to CaliforniaSpeculation is high that Oregon has, for the first time, begun formal exploration into the feasibility of sending surplus water from the Columbia River south to thirsty California. The success of the recently announced giant wind farm has water export proponents salivating at the chance to tap just a small portion of the average 265,000 cubic feet of water per second that slips by Oregon, unused but for power generation, fish habitat and limited shipping.

Closed-door sessions have been held privately in recent months to discuss the very future of the Columbia River as we know it today. People have been asking for Oregon’s water for a long time. In 1990 Kenneth Hahn, an LA County Supervisor, formally requested water from Oregon via pipe to offset the severe water shortages they were experiencing. Then governor Neil Goldschmidt said no to the request, as did then Washington governor Booth Gardner.

Oh, how times have changed. With Oregon now leading the way in green power exports with the proposed Shepherds’ Flat Wind Farm, many around the state see the opportunity to export water as the next logical export. Raymond Branxton, a leading proponent of the plan to export water, said recently, “Why wouldn’t we do this? Our state is one of the worst in the entire nation in unemployment and in shortages of state revenue. This extra water, and there is extra, believe me, is like gold or oil. Billions of dollars are at stake. And every single hour we simply watch as over six billion gallons of water goes by, untapped, and empties into the vast Pacific Ocean. I say tap it and tap it now. I am talking with government officials on a regular basis.”

It is estimated that Oregon could supply California with approximately 8 billion gallons of water each day without any deleterious effect on either the environment or shipping. That amount of water could easily end, forever, the shortages that have plagued Southern California for decades. At the same time, jobs and revenue would flow into Oregon in numbers never seen before. It is estimated that at least 7,000 new temporary jobs would be created to construct the pipe and that 125 permanent jobs would be created in maintaining the pipe and pumps needed to supply the water. Revenue for this water, at current California rates, could easily top six million dollars per day or more. “That is over two billion dollars of revenue per year for Oregon for something that costs Oregon nothing,” noted Branxton.

“How anyone could oppose this in times like these is a mystery to me,” exclaimed Branxton at a recent secret meeting to discuss water export. “The pipe can go right next to the power lines and we can run the pumps with the wind power. It is simply amazing to me that we have not moved forward on this much sooner. Goldschmidt is long gone — maybe our next governor will have the foresight to put this much-needed plan into place,” Branxton predicted.

tt twitter big4 Columbia River Water Next Export to California tt digg big4 Columbia River Water Next Export to California tt facebook big4 Columbia River Water Next Export to California tt reddit big4 Columbia River Water Next Export to California

Posted by at 08:16 | Posted in Measure 37 | 20 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • Rupert in Springfield

    Apparently DEQ has released a statement regarding their plans to grant initial approval.

    “This project represents a fundamental rethinking, in a more constructive and indeed more healthy manner both for Oregonians and our nation as a whole. With Oregon taxpayers funding the project, and California being granted the carbon offsets and water rights, this represents a win win situation.”

  • Jack Van Nostrand

    God, I hope this never happens!!

  • Bob Clark

    Oregonians and Washingtonians should be sure to be paid in cash on the barrel head, and not California IOUs or other debt. Also, get an iron clad contract signed off by U.S president and the U.S Congress. I say these things remembering back to when the BPA ran the Columbia extra hard during the 2000-2001 western electricity crisis inorder to keep the lights on in California. California thanked the BPA by stiffing it when it came to paying on the terms agreed to, and then, California turned to the court system and received credits against the contracts because the contracts were found (let’s say politically) unfair.

    Canada, namely, British Columbia, will want some bucks. But they can get their’s in IOUs.

    I think this idea offers large economic benefit to Oregonians and Washingtonians, creating a new stream of wealth which could be used to fund higher education and public infrastructure, spurring even more economic prosperity. Hopefully, this idea has more luck than the Columbia River Crossing project. By the time the locals get done with this latter project, Oregonians and Washingtonians will be lucky if they can cross the Columbia in a boat.

    There might also be environmental benefit as maybe there’s less pull on the Colorado river. Another place which could benefit from water exports is the Red River Valley in eastern North Dakota. They are swamped with water covering valuable farm land.

  • dfb

    Bad news guys, this is a *pipe dream*. This has as little chance as California tapping the Klamath – zilch. First, the price tag would be astronomical. California is already talking about spending ten to twenty billion on a 45 mile pipeline/canal/tunnel around the Sacramento-San Joaquin Rivers Delta. Our water rates will go up by 50% over a decade on top of the 60% in a decade we were told about last year. Your pipeline from the Columbia would not be financially viable from day one. For one, the state is broke. We already have gobs of debt. The kind of money you’re talking about would be better spent on desal and local reclamation (toilet to tap, storm water treatment, etc). Second, it will take too much power to move that water and may take much of the power Oregon already sends south. California spends 5-6% of its power consumption on water. California uses 2-3% of all power consumed in the state to pump the water over the Tehachapi Mountains from the Central Valley into Southern California. Your Columbia Straw will easily dwarf that amount of power and will very likely take a good chunk of the power we already get from Oregon. Sandia Labs wrote a report a few years ago on the energy-water nexus. At that time, it took about the same amount of power to pump water over the Tehachapis as it does to desalinate an equivalent amount of water. Technology is improving and some reported technology in development apparently will take about half that amount of energy. Third, Oregonians would soundly reject it at the ballot box on principle alone.

  • dfb

    BTW: Who held these secret meetings? It sure was not the California Department of Water Resources or Southern California Municipal Water Department, neither of which are even talking about tapping the Klamath, which I believe was the subject of Kenny Hahn’s request. I’m also not sure how much of a leading proponent Raymond Branxton can be if he is not found with Yahoo! or Google searches.

    • Mort

      So if it is not on Google it is not real?
      Great fact checking there.
      Don’t work too hard.
      When this pipe starts getting laid you will look back and wonder at your ineptitude.
      Secret tlaks go on all the time in Salem, in case you have not noticed.

      • Anonymous

        In fairness, Mort, I think what dfb is trying to say is, “Who the heck is Raymond Branxton?”

        And, Jerry, pray tell who is your inside source at these secret meetings? LOL That is classic, man, has to be one of the funniest things I’ve ever read here: “exclaimed Branxton at a recent secret meeting” – too funny.

        • Jerry

          You have a point. I guess the meeting wasn’t that secret.

          I wish I could reveal my sources, but they have told me I simply cannot. The canons of journalism protect them from ever having to reveal their identity.

      • dfb

        I left two comments: 1) This plan is a pipe dream; and 2) Who is this Raymond Branxton guy and who is involved in these secret meetings? I think you should read both.

        If references to Raymond Branxton cannot be found in Google or Yahoo! or Bing or any other search engine then he is irrelevant with regard to water exports to California. It demonstrates that he is not much of a proponent of anything, let along a leading proponent. I wouldn’t say if it is not found in a search engine it is not real; however searches do provide context, information about credentials, and identify where someone is on an issue. Even town gadflies appear in search engines. :-)

        Yes, secret talks go on all the time. I have them with my wife in the privacy of our own kitchen planning on how to make the world better; however, just like these “secret talks” with Raymond Branxton (in some non descript location) they don’t change the world. Private talks in Salem do not also equate to private talks between Salem and Sacramento or even Los Angeles. If you have not realized, California needs to go along with this plan.

        To lay this pipe line, no matter its route, you need to cross the state of Oregon and then cross most of the state of California. If you haven’t heard, it is mostly Southern California that is hurting for water and some farmers in the San Joaquin Valley (southern half of the Central Valley). Most farmers get 100% of their water allocations.

        The cost of such a pipeline is cost prohibitive. Before you begin to lay the pipes, you will need spec the project out, get realistic sounding estimates, and then seek financing. Come back when you have cost estimates. You should know that SoCal is already appearing to balk at the $11 billion water bond due on the Nov. ballot and is also second guessing the other $15 billion that will be required to build a peripheral canal around the Delta. You’ll be hard pressed to squeeze even another $10 billion out of it, although the Columbia Pipeline would likely cost 20 times that amount and require tons of electricity to boot. That kind of money is better spent on local sources of water and desal.

        In other words, I’ll be astonished if a meter of this pipe is ever laid. But if I am wrong, I will not feel a fool or an idiot for ever doubting this plan. I’ll just sit back and watch you flush your money. ;-)

        Plus, Californians would rather just move to Oregon where the water is than pay; it’ll be cheaper. ;-)

  • jim karlock

    How about putting the inlet for the pipe a few hundred feet offshore of the mouth of the Columbia (or other river of California’s choice) and let California build the whole thing? Offshore. And pay for it. In Oregon waters so we can collect some $$.

    Thanks
    JK

    • Ron Glynn

      As a lifelong Oregonian, I want to say that Raymond Branxton is a great visionary. Californians have long dreamed of tapping into our wonderful Columbia River so they can keep filling all those backyard swimming pools. I say lets give them all the water they want. They should all go to Astoria to get it and they had better bring a lot of buckets.

      • dfb

        More than 80% of water consumed in California are used for agriculture. It is lawns that use about 50-60% of municipal water. Though swimming pools do take water, there is little evaporation when used with a solar cover. :-)

        • Ron Glynn

          Hey Dude. I knew that. It is satire. We can’t be serious all the time.

  • Moe

    I think this guy is just blowing smoke. Who ever heard of this Branxton guy? I did check on a name search engine and found several Branxtons, but none that lived in OR. I think we have been had by this fool!

  • Pingback: www.h2oreport.com

  • dartagnan

    A little early for April Fool pranks, isn’t it?

  • v person

    Boy are you guys gullible. Jerry is having his way with you once again. He has used “Raymond Braxton” as one of his imaginary friends on many occasions. Yeeks.

  • Diamond Jim Fraconni

    If they can steal our wind power then they can steal our water.

    • v person

      Yes Jerry. But they can’t steal your odd imagination now can they? Not that they would want to.

      By the way. “They” are not “stealing” our wind power. They are “buying” electrons generated from wind in Oregon sent to California via transmission lines. Last I looked we were a single nation with mostly free trade across state lines. And “our” hydro power already goes there.

  • John Carten

    The WATER shortages in the US SouthWest and Mexico that can only be addressed by massive WATER imports from CANADA – a project that was canceled due to political corruption in CANADA and, especially BRITISH COLUMBIA,

    Recently disclosed internal government documents prove the British Columbia government intentionally violated the FREE TRADE AGREEMENT / NAFTA and the GATT

    These documents are now posted online for the first time at

    http://www.waterwarcrimes.com

    These documents corroborate and support the $10.5 billion claim for arbitration against CANADA by SUN BELT WATER INC. under Chapter 11 of the NAFTA.

    Visit http://www.sunbeltwater.com

    US Senator John McCain stated in Ottawa, Canada’s capital city, on June 20, 2008, when asked about water exports from Canada

    “water exports will be the defining issue of the 21st century”

    The political corruption in Canada surrounding bulk water exports is now emerging in a lawsuit in Canada’s Federal Court that the Canadian media is under instructions not to write about.

    Eight judges linked to this lawsuit and the water export political corruption suddenly dropped dead as their crimes were exposed and they became a liability to insiders. Murder or suicide is a real possibility.

    This is a true story that reveals the dark side of Canada.

    Visit http://www.waterwarcrimes.com

    Follow on twitter

    http://www.twitter.com/waterwarcrimes

    • dfb

      Should anyone stumble upon this thread, note that Carten’s web site reads like a conspiracy theory on par with X Files. It provides very little evidence to back up the assertions made. I would also like to point out that NAFTA came into being in 1994, 3 years after the contract with Sun Belt Water, Inc. was alleged to have been executed and then canceled. Therefore, actions of B.C. could not violate NAFTA. Moreover, it should be noted that appropriative water law generally allows cancellation of rights to appropriate water without compensation when they are speculative, not beneficial or reasonable, violate other laws in existence, or generally tend to violate public policy or the public trust. If B.C. follows appropriative water law (I understand it does) then its water laws follow similar basic water law principles. There are also federal Canadian water laws/regulations and the water rights of First Nations that B.C. would need to contend with before allowing such export. If you want the dark side of Canada, I suggest visiting an Inuit village at this time of year.

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)