State ‘Pre-Certified’ $336 Million in 2009 BETC Tax Giveaways

Wingard Matt 2009.serendipityThumb State Pre Certified $336 Million in 2009 BETC Tax GiveawaysOregon last year authorized $336 million in “pre-certified” tax giveaways under the state’s Business Energy Tax Credit (BETC) program. Rep. Matt Wingard (R-Wilsonville) said the Legislature should examine why the tax credits were allowed to spiral out of control, and he called on his colleagues to once again pass a bill to contain the program’s escalating costs.

“The BETC program is an example of poor government planning, and one of the major reasons why politicians are asking for more money out of cash-strapped Oregon businesses and individuals,” said Rep. Wingard, who supported 2009 legislation to reduce the tax credit. “Oregonians should be outraged the Governor low-balled the program’s costs, vetoed legislation to reduce the tax credit, and then signed $733 million in income and corporate tax increases.”

The 2007 Legislature increased the tax credit for renewable energy systems installed by businesses from 35 percent to 50 percent and increased the project cost limit from $10 million to $20 million– leading to an ever increasing amount of applications filed to receive the generous tax credit. Investigative reporting found that the Governor’s office deliberately underestimated the program’s costs to win legislative approval of the expansion. Millions in tax credits have since been awarded for “˜green’ projects that may never be completed.

“Despite the controversy, there has not been much discussion on the amount of applications in 2009 that were pre-certified to receive a tax credit,” Rep. Wingard said. “The data on 2009 pre-certified tax credits demonstrates the volatile growth of the program and the potential impact on the General Fund. It also stands as a glaring example of Salem’s chronic fiscal irresponsibility.”

Rep. Wingard said that the BETC program has diverted hundreds of millions of dollars away from essential General Fund-supported programs such as education, public safety and health care. The Legislature’s simultaneous passage of $733 million in permanent, job-killing taxes is further proof that state government is failing to spend tax dollars wisely.

“It’s hard to claim the state is desperate for money to fund schools at the same time it is giving away hundreds of millions of dollars to promote “˜green’ projects,” Rep. Wingard said. “The BETC tax credit data shows that many in Salem would rather raise taxes during a recession than prioritize spending and put our school kids first.”

tt twitter big4 State Pre Certified $336 Million in 2009 BETC Tax Giveaways tt digg big4 State Pre Certified $336 Million in 2009 BETC Tax Giveaways tt facebook big4 State Pre Certified $336 Million in 2009 BETC Tax Giveaways tt reddit big4 State Pre Certified $336 Million in 2009 BETC Tax Giveaways

Posted by at 11:10 | Posted in Measure 37 | 21 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • retired UO science prof

    A good program to kill. If the Republicans fought harder against this stuff, there’d be less trouble with the general budget. The Republicans though are largely complicit — a lot of goodies for rural Oregon and small business.

    • Steve Plunk

      Nice to agree with with the Prof for a change. Too often Republicans go along with projects merely to be seen as kindly sorts or more open minded. I say hold the line on the garbage bills and only support those that are really needed. We have too many laws and need to be more selective in what we pass. This law is another example of how unintended consequences can pop up everywhere.

      • Rupert in Springfield

        >This law is another example of how unintended consequences can pop up everywhere.

        I’m getting a little tired of excusing mistakes that people should be held accountable for as “unintended consequences”

        Look, if you schedule a tax credit that runs orders of magnitude more than projections, that is not an unintended consequence.

        That is willful lying about the cost of a bill in order to get it passed.

        It is also gross negligence in not writing the bill with a cap.

        It is getting a little ridiculous that we constantly direct all this anger at nebulous entities like “Big CEOS” and seek to hold them accountable. Some big CEO getting a bonus is something of no real financial import to anyone. Yet we seek far more accountability from him than we do our own government when the financial impact of this sort of scam is far greater.

        We are being asked to pass two major tax increases with close to 50% of the reason ($336 million ) due to the governments incompetence regarding this program. People should be held to account.

    • Rupert in Springfield

      Oh please, this is not the Republicans fault.

      Look, this was a pet project of Teds and we all know if the Republicans had blocked its inception all the Democrats would have been jumping up and down about how the Republicans were against tax credits, thus were a bunch of hypocrites and they hate the planet yadda yadda.

      Sure, some Republican districts might have benefited and I am sure some Republican somewhere made money off of this, but lets get real. This was a toy of Ted who is famous for his Michael Jackson like fascination with technology. Democrats underestimated the cost of this program by orders of magnitude. To try and put that off on the Republicans is just absurd.

      They underestimated costs by orders of magnitude, and now they are looking to raise taxes to pay for it.

      Yes, it would have been great for Republicans to stop the program before it started. However failure to do so does not mean that the Democrats are then granted license to steal as they did. They certainly should not be granted tax increases to recoup the cost of their theft.

      Sorry, the attempt to shift blame to the Republicans for not stopping Democrat larceny is just simply laughable.

      • retired UO science prof

        Where did I exculpate the Democrats?

        And you display just what the problem is with the Republicans, besides their eagerness to grab a buck when it benefits them. “If we oppose this we’ll be called bad names. Waaahhh!” No wonder they lose.

        • Rupert in Springfield

          >Where did I exculpate the Democrats?

          When your blame is expressed exclusively for Republicans for not stopping the program.

          No blame at all for Democrats. Seems pretty clear to me what you were doing.

          >And you display just what the problem is with the Republicans, besides their eagerness to grab a buck when it benefits them. “If we oppose this we’ll be called bad names. Waaahhh!”

          Not at all. I wasn’t excusing Republicans for not trying to stop the bill. I even explicitly said they should have stopped it. Here is the quote:

          “Yes, it would have been great for Republicans to stop the program before it started. ”

          I just said it was really a little lame to blame them now since we all know Democrats would have wet their pants screaming how the Republicans were obstructionist for opposing the bill.

          Republicans grabbing a buck when it benefits them? Excuse me? Are you aware of measure 66 and 67? You guys are trying to raise taxes to cover this fiasco and the pay raises. Seems like the only buck grabbing I am seeing is from you guys.

          Its not a pretty picture, but it definitely is the Democrats own doing so I can understand your crying “Waaaahhhhh” like a little baby when this is pointed out to you.

          As for Republicans losing, well, don’t see where that has been happening at least nationally of late. When you have a tie ballgame in a MA senate race, on top of losing two governors races, that says a hell of a lot about peoples feeling for the direction government is going.

          State wide?

          You guys won. Its about time you get over it and take some responsibility. This trying to say the tax credits were bad so Republicans are to be blamed for not stopping them is really a little silly.

          No wonder you guys are on the outs.

  • Jerry

    Agree with prof on this, too. The repubs are as bad as the dems. They are all corrupt and useless. These programs will not work, either. Ever.
    They just won’t.
    Bad policy.
    Very bad.
    What a bunch of losers.

  • Rupert in Springfield

    Add up this little tax credit scam of Teds and combine it with the union pay raises and you get pretty close to the amount measure 66 and 67 are supposed to raise. Gee, it always seems to be such a coincidence. Politicians whose term is near over all of a sudden seem to be involved in pay offs to certain select business’s. Wow, wonder what that is all about?

    Anyway – Imagine the popularity of 66 and 67 if we were honest.

    “Oregon needs to pass 66 and 67 because without them we will not be able to pay for pay raises in state government and tax credits for politically connected business”

    That’s the choice we as Oregonians need to make.

    Should we pass 66 and 67 to fund fat cat union pay raises during a recession, and to make sure Ted has richly lined business pockets to hire him when he leaves office?

  • eagle eye

    I concur with the prof, the Plunk, the Rupert, and Jerry. Yikes!

    • Steve Buckstein

      Finally, we find something people on opposite sides of many issues here can agree on. Anybody gearing up to churn out “Stop BETC” bumper stickers?

      • v person

        I’ll offer a counter view. Mend it, but don’t end it.

        • retired UO science prof

          We know how that turned out!

          OK, let’s hear it.

          • v person

            Hear what…how to mend it? I’m no legislator, but clearly we need to have a limit on how much we “spend” on this. Eliminating it would risk our already meager competitive advantage in attracting private capital to manufacture and install alternative energy products. That would be short sighted.

          • re

            we need to have a limit on how much we “spend”

            We must be quantitative!

        • JK

          Get rid of ALL superstition from government and BETC is as good a place to start as any.

          Then follow up by shutting down all “stopping climate change” activities. Then fire everyone at the department of energy that is involved in spreading the peak oil superstition.

    • Jerry

      That really is something! For once we all agree. KING!

  • Rupert in Springfield

    >it would risk our already meager competitive advantage in attracting private capital to manufacture and install alternative energy products. That would be short sighted.

    There is absolutely nothing short sited in ending a tax credit to business that would be non viable without it.

    It amazes me how on Measure 67 we hear “well, if they cant afford a tax increase maybe they shouldn’t be in business”

    However with some goofy tax credit we here that it would somehow be short sighted to end it?

    Why?

    If it is right that a business should go under due to a tax increase, then surly it is right a business should go under for rescinding a tax credit.

    • v person

      “There is absolutely nothing short sited in ending a tax credit to business that would be non viable without it.”

      Tell that to the Danes, who have just about the top economy in Europe, are selling us their wind turbines, import no oil, and all this after having spent decades nurturing their alternative energy industry. I’d say they were pretty long sited.

      • Tami

        “The Danes” would say:

        What’s “just about” mean – just about like your other BS?

        http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/oil-still-fuels-the-green-state-of-denmark/article1382028/

        Lying reliably since whenever – Dean Apostol!

        • va. person

          “What’s “just about” mean – just about like your other BS?”

          You mean that “other BS” that it turned out you had completely wrong, as in how I make my living?

          “Just about” in this case means it depends how you measure it. The Danes are near the top of the EU in per capita income, have nearly the lowest unemployment rate, and have had above average growth rates for years. They also have nearly the happiest people on the planet. Those darn socialists just don’t know what is bad for them I guess.

  • Frank Williams

    Good job Jim when do you want to go TV 541 269 9665 Saw you on CH 14 you looked good Frank

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)