Coos County: Vote YES for the Right to Bear Arms!

handgun

by Rob Taylor

The Second Amendment Preservation Ordinance, or Measure 6-151 will be on the ballot for voters in Coos County, Oregon, on November 3, 2015.

If approved, this measure prevents the use of county resources to enforce certain restrictions on gun ownership.  It would invalidate and void any law that violates provisions guaranteeing the right to bear arms in the U.S. Constitution and the Oregon Constitution.

Moreover, Measure 6-151 would prohibit the use of county funds or resources to enforce any law that impedes the right to bear arms, including, but not limited to, laws that establish:

  • Registration requirements for legally owned firearms
  • Prohibitions against “assault” type firearms
  • Restrictions pertaining to magazine or clip capacity and ammunition type
  • Background check requirements beyond those required as of December 2012
  • Restrictions against possession, carry or transport of legally owned guns and ammunition

Measure 6-151 encourages the county sheriff to use existing discretionary authority to preclude any particular part of a law that violates the Second Amendment rights of the individual.  The Sheriff already has the power to prioritize crimes according to the discretion of the office and the department already responds to calls based on the resources available.  The Coos County Sheriff’s department will not respond to a litany of crimes due to funding.

The sheriff currently uses discretionary authority to downgrade good laws to low, or no priority levels, so why not have the sheriff use that same authority to relegate a bad law.

Approval of the measure is not retroactive against criminal laws regarding firearms, meaning it does not nullify any criminal laws previously established.

However, its passage would apply to defunding the enforcement of Oregon Senate Bill 941 at the local level.  Additionally, the initiative would institute fines of $2,000 per violation for individuals and $4,000 per violation for corporations for any efforts to enforce laws, rules, or policies prohibited by Measure 6-151.

It would be good thing to have a law that imposes punitive damages against any individual or corporation violating anyone’s Second Amendment rights.   All individual rights should have such a caveat.

Of course, criminals ignore the laws and enforcing prolonged background checks could, and has, prevented individuals from defending themselves from perpetrators committing the very crimes not enforced by an underfunded law enforcement agency, which might be the reason Coos County Sheriff, Craig Zanni, signed the petition.

Remember, the legislature in Salem passed SB941 and unnecessarily attached an “emergency clause” to it, so the people could not seek legal recourse through the filing of a public referendum.  Challenging the state at the local level forces the issue to the courts, which can then determine the constitutionality of both laws.  More importantly, maybe the representatives will learn the concerns of their constituents, so they can respond accordingly.

Support the right to bear arms by voting YES for the Second Amendment Ordinance, Measure 6-151.  Sign-up at www.CoosCountyWatchdog.com to receive more information, or join the conversation on Facebook at www.facebook.com/cooscountysecondamendmentordinance.

Rob Taylor is the founder of Coos County Watchdog, which is a virtual network of local activist.  

 

Other Sources:

The Bend Bulletin:
http://www.bendbulletin.com/localstate/3622805-151/ballot-measure-in-coos-county-seeks-to-nullify

The Oregonian:
http://www.oregonlive.com/mapes/index.ssf/2015/10/can_an_oregon_county_void_gun.html

The World:
http://theworldlink.com/news/opinion/editorial/our-view-vote-no-on-county-second-amendment-law/article_3ab37946-dd74-5480-90a7-58dbbf3a1938.html

KCBY TV:
http://www.kcby.com/news/noon/Rob-Taylor—2nd-Amendment-P-325755761.html

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn Post to Reddit

Posted by at 05:00 | Posted in 2nd Amendment | 10 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • Dick Winningstad

    Good for Coos County.

    • I’m finally getting 111 Dollars an h r,….It’s time to take some action and you can join it too.It is simple,dedicated and easy way to get rich.Three weeks from now you will wish you have started today….

      ===>>> Link in my pr0f1Ie

      160

  • Eric Blair

    “Additionally, the initiative would institute fines of $2,000 per violation for individuals and $4,000 per violation for corporations for any efforts to enforce laws, rules, or policies prohibited by Measure 6-151.”

    What does that part of the initiative mean? Individuals in their own homes, or corporations on their private property, couldn’t restrict the possession of a firearm?

    • thevillageidiot

      That is a good question. Too bad you do not apply property rights to other points you make.

      • Eric Blair

        Such as? Not every point needs to reference property rights.

        • thevillageidiot

          Oil and mineral rights private property. Water rights should be private property but is not. must have permission to drill a well. income private property taxes are theft of private property by majority vote. most recent issue on the november ballot is theft of profits from businesses by majority vote of those who do not pay the full cost of transportation. pretty much everything should be viewed from the perspective of private property. people own the money in their possession until traded for some other good that is private property of a producer. What would not be?

    • Dick Winningstad

      You are free to maintain a gun free zone on your property be it your home or business.

      • Eric Blair

        I would hope so… but I can’t seem to find any additional information. And the wording is potentially worrisome.

  • Jack Lord God

    Sounds like a good law, and hardly unprecedented. Sanctuary cities spring to mind. In those any use of funds or personnel to enforce immigration law is prohibited. I like the “taste of yer own medicine” aspect here. I especially like the aspect of holding government employees personally liable for violating the law.

    • guess who

      As all government employees and elected officials should be held.

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)