Transportation Bait and Switch

Democrats love to promise “infrastructure spending,” a phrase ripe with the logical fallacy of equivocation where a loaded term means different things. For many businesses across our state, infrastructure most readily means expanding freeway capacity in the Portland area so that our main economic engine’s own local traffic does not block the predictability of the beaver state’s exports to its significantly wealthier evergreen state neighbor to the north and to prevent this gridlock from raising shipping costs on all Oregonians. To Democrats, the same word tends to instead mean bike paths and light rail.

The bait got switched on us yesterday when the House Transportation Committee failed to schedule HB3231 for a vote, killing the most promising move toward building a bypass freeway on Portland’s westside, something like the I-205, but for the side of the city where there are more commuters, more freight, and more growth. Its sponsor, Rep. Rich Vial (R-Scholls), lamented that it was killed by what he called “pretty vehement opposition” from people trying to sell different products who worried his bill would undercut efforts to improve public transportation and bike lanes.

The Oregon Catalyst has run many articles over the years pointing out what a no-brainer the Westside Bypass is. It would simultaneously relieve three bottlenecks at once: reducing traffic on HWY-217, through the HWY-26 tunnel, and on the I-5 interstate bridge. It would also significantly reduce housing costs, opening up new opportunities for bedroom community development in what are now difficult to navigate areas along the periphery of the Beaverton-Hillsboro-Wilsonville industrial triangle.

Vial deserves a lot of credit for his leadership on this issue. When the rest of Salem finally gets serious about transportation infrastructure, when it stops talking and starts building, then a western arterial freeway that directly connects our Silicon Forest with Seattle should be among our first priorities.

Eric Shierman lives in Salem and is the author of A Brief History of Political Cultural Change.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn Post to Reddit

Posted by at 05:00 | Posted in Columbia River Crossing, Oregon House, Portland, Transportation, Westside Bypass | 2 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • Oregon Engineer

    Since Portland and Eugene pretty much control the state legislature (both houses) new roads will always be lowest on the priority list. Now for a viable suggestion, create a tollway through private funding. May still be difficult from the aspect it probably has to be approved by the legislature (permission to build) but it may be an easier sell since it will not take funding from pet projects and the crony supporters for bike paths and light rail.

  • Bob Clark

    This is too bad. Need to keep trying, though. Maybe an initiative petition, and funded by tolls and private construction/owner operator so as to bypass the need for the state government apparatus as much as possible.

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)