House GOP Asks “Where’s Rainy Day Fund?”

Press Release from Oregon Republican House Office, 1-30-07

HOUSE REPUBLICANS ASK: WHAT HAPPENED TO TALK OF A RAINY DAY FUND?

SALEM”” Oregon House Republicans today renewed their call for an effective “rainy day” fund with sufficient reserves to prepare for future budget shortfalls. While the majority Democrats are proposing $800 million in new taxes despite record state revenues, Republicans are concerned the discussion has shifted away from responsible spending and planning for future needs.

“Judging by their proposed spending, Democrats must not think it will rain again in Oregon ,” said House Republican Leader Wayne Scott. “We are in the fourth week of session, and the majority party has yet to present a serious proposal that protects Oregon from the next economic recession.

“House Republicans are prepared to lead, and we’re developing a rainy day fund that’s built on current revenue and that establishes strict limits on how the funds should be tapped.”

Gov. Ted Kulongoski has presented the Democrats’ only rainy day proposal, which “diverts” the corporate kicker rebate into a reserve fund. The Governor’s proposal sets aside $275 million, a level that amounts to only 1.8 percent of General Fund expenditures.

At least 20 states have rainy day funds of 5 to 9.99 percent of General Fund expenditures. Thirteen states have rainy day funds of 10 percent or more. Oregon ‘s lack of a rainy day fund contributes to the state’s credit rating, which is among the worst in the nation and results in higher borrowing costs for taxpayers.

“A rainy day fund only works when it has sufficient revenue to protect against future budget shortfalls,” Rep. Scott said. “The Legislature has an opportunity to prepare for the next rainy day, but the Democrats are leaving their umbrellas at home.”

# # #

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn Post to Reddit

Posted by at 06:30 | Posted in Measure 37 | 4 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • Jerry

    What did you expect? They are Dems.

  • Anonymous

    using the corporate ticker is a great idea to fund the rainey day fund. I mean, c’mon a 10 buck minimum corporate tax? i wish MY income was subsidized so heavily. Corps make WAY more than me, and yet pay far less in taxes. that seems fair.

  • Jerry

    There you go again with the “fair”argument. It would be much more “fair” to me if you paid more in taxes. I say keep your kicker to fund the rainy day fund, which is a joke.

    • Captain_Anon

      so what is your idea of fairness? you complain a lot, but what are your solutions that are fair? why should a corporation that makes millions pay only 10 bucks while the average oregon income is around $43,000 and they pay in the thousands?

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)