Sustainability, Livability and Other Pipe Dreams

Right From the Start

Last week the Portland Tribune carried a story headlined: “Livability Isn’t Enough to Keep Portland Ahead.”
The story went on to state:

“Portland leaders have long boasted that the local economy benefits from the region’s legacy of environmental activism.

“According to this argument, Portland is an international model of sustainable redevelopment, attracting environmentally minded residents and exporting its expertise to other cities wanting to follow Portland’s example.”

That in and of itself is an act of monumental self-delusion. For years, Portland’s uber left political class has bounced from one trendy agenda to the next, all the while congratulating themselves on being the “model,” or the “leader,” in whatever it is they have undertaken. But in the real world – the world outside of Multnomah County – Portland leads primarily in snarky comments about it by late night television talk show hosts.

The Tribune article sharpens the point by noting:

“A recent report on the local economy, however, questions how much longer Portland can maintain that advantage. The report, released last month by the Portland Business Alliance and a number of other business-related groups, says that many cities are focusing on improving their quality of life, eroding whatever edge Portland enjoyed.

“What’s more, according to the report, some of those cities, including Denver and Seattle, have higher average wages than Portland.”

Portland’s political leadership fails to understand that a good idea poorly implemented is just as big a disaster as a bad idea. That is particularly true for the uber left which greatly enjoys spending your money on their great ideas.

In the case of Portland’s political leadership it is routinely the same problem – the failure of any consideration of the human equation. It is a fundamental failure to understand that the quality of life, the livability of a city, the sustainability of a development, begins with a job. Absent a well paying job, the pretty picture that is Portland, is just an empty promise.

These aren’t evil people; they are simply ignorant. Most of Portland’s political leadership has spent a lifetime working for government. They lack a fundamental understanding of what it takes to create, maintain or grow a job producing business. For them business is a source of tax revenues. Beyond that they care little about the nature of business or the impact of their decisions on business.

For instance, Portland views its land use system as a model for urban planning. (Yes, I know that Metro does the land use planning but it is populated by the same uber left politicians and bureaucrats as Portland.) It looks good on paper. It deals adroitly with also sorts of “neat” issues that protect trash fish, over-populated birds, and microorganisms that no one is sure what they do. But the myriad of rules, the conflicting requirements and the shear absorption of time are smothering business development and thus job creation. Worse yet, the impact on business development and job creation is seldom seriously considered in the lengthy development of the system.

Portland’s political leadership also suffers from a lack of understanding about the scarcity of resources – the essence of proportionality or the need for prioritizing among competing “good ideas.” That is a predictable result of giving decision making to people who have spent a lifetime spending other people’s money without any appreciation of the difficulty in producing that money. Portland’s light rail system is a perfect example of that. If one light rail route is good, then a dozen must be great. If a light rail system is good, then a trolley system must be better and a tram must be perfect. Never mind that all that it accomplished was moving people off of a highly efficient and flexible bus system and on to an inflexible, weather dependent, and multiple transfer system that greatly increases the per rider cost. Forget the initial cost of constructing the system – all paid by tax dollars – the recurring operation and maintenance costs take up so much of the government’s budgets that taxes remain high and access to other services remains limited.

And finally, this type of political leadership lacks any sense of symmetry between its words and its actions. For instance, the two newest “trendy” ideas are to promote a “sustainable” development in a “green” economy. Flush with the excitement of being an “international model” the uber left – centered in Portland – rushed to embrace biofuels, wind energy and solar power. Left on the floor of their planning were three critical elements:

1. The real cost of producing and refining biofuels both on crop production and total energy consumption. It now appears that taking fields out of production of food in order to grow crops for biofuel, the chemicals needed to grow the fuel crops and the refining of those products into biofuels suggest that the process causes more harm than good. Meanwhile, the same people who promoted biofuels still condemn the use of forest byproducts as biofuels because – gasp – they may involve cutting down a tree for profit.

2. The rush to production of massive windfarms has scarred the landscape once allegedly cherished by the very people promoting wind energy. Not only are the massive wind generators a blight on Oregon’s vistas, but most importantly – and apparently ignored by the uber left until recently – massive power lines are needed to bring the power from where it is generated in Eastern Oregon to where it is consumed in the Willamette Valley. The very people supporting wind power now resist construction of power lines.

3. And finally, none of these “sustainable” energy resources are actually sustainable economically. Each and everyone – wind, solar, an biofuel – require massive taxpayer financed government subsidies both as to their construction and their operation and maintenance. Even President Obama – the nation’s chief uber leftist acknowledged that the cost of power consumption would rise massively in order to pursue “sustainable” energy.

Having said all of that, the fact remains that the uber left political leadership of Portland reflects the overwhelming majority of Portland’s citizenry. Many of Portland’s business leaders cling stubbornly to the belief that Portland voters will throw out the current crop of “dreamers” and install new leaders with an eye towards economically sustainable policies.

In the immortal words of Pres. George H.W. Bush, “Not going to happen.” Portland is what it is. Sheer numbers in the polls demonstrate that there will not be a change so long as there is a source of money to fuel these pipe dreams. It is for this very reason that Portland continues to see an outward migration of existing businesses, a decision by existing business to expand elsewhere, a lack of success in recruitment of new business, and a continuing decline in per capita income as well paying jobs follow the decisions of businesses.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn Post to Reddit

Posted by at 08:10 | Posted in Economy, Uncategorized | 27 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • Dr. No Way

    These same geniuses who tout “sustainability” for everybody else don’t seem to mind that their own bloated government budgets, salaries, benefits and pensions are unsustainable. They seem to completely ignore the fact that growing government beyond its means is unsustainable, all the while preaching to everybody else about the way they live. I believe HYPOCRACY is the word I’m looking for here…

  • Bob Clark

    I share this article’s sentiments about Portland city and Multnomah County governance. I feel the citizens of Portland and Multnomah are blinded by lavish federal and state subsidies, much like Greeks were deluded by an overspending national government (much of it based on borrowed monies). The only hope for Oregon is growing a strong private sector in Washington county so as to allow this county to overtake Multnomah county in voting population. The other game changer would be if the Federal government were restructured such that transit and other subsidies slowed, causing the citizens of Portland and Multnomah to actually face the true cost of their various pipe dreams.

    Just today Evergreen Solar Company announced closure of its Massachuettes solar panel manufacturing plant. This company took over $58 million dollars in state taxpayer monies to build the plant, and the benefits to these taxpayers are pretty much gone now. Portland and Oregon are making the same errors. Public monies for seriously uneconomic “green” projects. We can’t keep spending like this without repercussions. And it shows with the relative underperformance of the local and state economies for over a decade now.

  • valley person

    Uber left? You used that 4 or 5 times. Is that the new buzzword?

    Quality of life does not begin with a “job” Larry. Slaves had jobs, but not much quality of life. If I run my own business, is that a “job”? Not really. If I own a bunch of stock and manage my investments, is that a job? No. If I am retired and have a decent pension, is that a job? No again. If I am in college on an academic scholarship, do I need a job? Nope. Everyone needs some sort of income,but everyone does not need a job. So quality of life can’t possibly begin nor end at that point.

    Seattle and Denver have higher average incomes than Portland? That has always been the case for Seattle. They have Microsoft, Amazon, Starbucks, and Boeing. All a result of geographic advantage or luck in who was born there. As it turns out, both cities are doing much of what Portland has done to attract young, educated talent, which is focusing on the very things you complain about.

    • Steve Plunk

      Playing word games instead of addressing the issue. Slaves did not have jobs, they were not paid. Business owners ( I am one ) do have jobs if they go to work. Dance around all you want because if that’s all you got we see right through it.

      You ask anyone out of work if jobs are an important part of their quality of life and you know what the answer will be. To claim quality of life doesn’t begin with gainful employment and the ability to provide is liberal silliness. But keep commenting for gosh sakes so we can see exactly how twisted the liberal mind is these days.

      • valley person

        I did address the issue. For reasons stated, a “job” is not a prerequisite to quality of life. Slaves definitely did have jobs. they just were not paid more than room and board for the work. Some business owners have jobs, others simply have ownership. Same is true for investors.

        Ask anyone out of work? You really think there are no people “out of work” who would differ from your characterization? Clue in Steve. A lot of people, yours truly included, do not measure the quality of our lives based on jobs.

        “Wealth,” broadly defined, is far more important than “job”.

      • valley person

        I did address the issue. For reasons stated, a “job” is not a prerequisite to quality of life. Slaves definitely did have jobs. they just were not paid more than room and board for the work. Some business owners have jobs, others simply have ownership. Same is true for investors.

        Ask anyone out of work? You really think there are no people “out of work” who would differ from your characterization? Clue in Steve. A lot of people, yours truly included, do not measure the quality of our lives based on jobs.

        “Wealth,” broadly defined, is far more important than “job”.

  • Rupert in Springfield

    As stated, the basic point here is that Portland is ruled by people who love spending other peoples money.

    End the subsidies and you would have a remarkable change. Reason would enter the picture.

    In other words, you might actually have people complete the equation that $250M a mile for choo choos just isn’t going to work. That you can’t spin your way out of a problem with windmills as there simply isn’t the energy density to make it work.

    Like the kid with the rock band, once the parents subsidization ends, fiscal reality enters the picture. Yes, he will pick up his guitar from time to time thereafter. Just as in the future we will all look at the occasional blight of windmill farms that remain.

    Like the once and future rock star we will look back on the indulgence and realize it was a fun period in our lives and that has value. We will realize that yes, in the back of our minds we really knew all along it couldn’t go on forever.

    • valley person

      Portland is ruled by people elected by the people who provide the money to spend. If Portland people want the place to be more like Springfield, then they can elect people who do pretty much nothing and let the place deteriorate.

      • Rupert in Springfield

        Your comments regarding Springfield are a nice exhibition of your provincialism. Congrats! You did my job for me this time, both concisely and predictably.

        • valley person

          Its not my fault Springfield is what it is Rupert. I’m just an observer is all. To my eye, the place needs a good scrubbing. You seem to like it as is, which is fine. Its a free country, and you are free to enjoy living in decrepitude.

          But doesn’t your constant criticism of Portland say something about your own provincialism?

  • TOM

    VERY WELL SPOKEN…THEY INDEED HAVE THEIR HEADS IN THE SAND!

  • Pingback: Blue Coaster33()

  • Pingback: free movie downloads()

  • Pingback: streaming movies()

  • Pingback: water purification systems()

  • Pingback: car parking()

  • Pingback: parking()

  • Pingback: nu()

  • Pingback: water ionizer plans()

  • Pingback: pay per day loans plan()

  • Pingback: electrician reviews()

  • Pingback: redirected here()

  • Pingback: continue()

  • Pingback: plumbing snakes for narrow pipes()

  • Pingback: ferguson plumbing supply raleigh nc()

  • Pingback: house blue()

  • Pingback: water ionizer payment plan()

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)