Attorney General candidate Dean Klonoff in hypocrisy twist

Measure 49 reveals hypocrisy in academia
By Ross Day
Oregonians In Action EC
Looking Forward Magazine.

The popular comedian and political commentator Stephen Colbert once said “I am all for free speech, except when I disagree with it.” If the events that transpired during the campaign on Ballot Measure 49 are any indication, this quote — and certainly its sentiment — seem to be the philosophy of the Lewis & Clark College, its law school, and to the dean of the law school, Robert Klonoff.

In October, a letter was sent to Oregonians from former Dean of the Lewis & Clark College of Law, James Huffman, in opposition to Measure 49. In response, Dean Klonoff issued a press release feigning indignation at Dean Huffman’s letter.

Klonoff claimed it was disappointing that Oregonians In Action would use the “[S]chool’s good name for a partisan political purpose.” Klonoff went on to say in the press release, and in a subsequent press release, that by using the law school’s name on the envelope of the letter, Huffman’s letter gave the public the impression the law school had taken a position on Measure 49, which it had not.

Of course, Klonoff never issued a press release “deploring” associate professor of law John Kroger for using Lewis & Clark College, and the Lewis & Clark College of Law, to issue a press release in September (before Huffman’s letter was sent, mind you) announcing his candidacy for Oregon Attorney General. Professor Kroger clearly used Lewis & Clark College and the law school for a partisan political purpose and made it appear as though the law school was supporting Kroger’s candidacy for a partisan political office. (By the way, you can still find Professor Kroger’s press release on the Lewis & Clark website)

By contrast, Huffman’s letter had his home address in the return address, and the letter was clear that it came from the “personal desk” of Dean Huffman.

Klonoff’s concern about a “fair debate” didn’t seem to be an issue when the Lewis & Clark Law School hosted a speaking event in September entitled “Yes on 49!” (the press release and video podcast are both still available on Lewis & Clark’s website), and did not bother to invite the opponents of Measure 49 to the discussion. Both the title of the event, as well as the law school’s website, certainly give the impression that the “good name” of the Lewis & Clark College of Law was being used to support Measure 49.

Where was Klonoff’s outrage then? Where was Klonoff’s concern about “fair debate” or the use of the school’s “good name”? Did Professor Kroger or the Environmental Law Caucus also get letters from Klonoff’s lawyers threatening a lawsuit?


Klonoff’s unilateral reaction to Dean Huffman’s letter reflects the obvious double standard that appears to prevail at Lewis & Clark College, its law school, and throughout academia. Professors are free to advertise their political beliefs in concert with their position of respect and authority, so long as those beliefs reflect a liberal political philosophy. As soon as one of their own in academia – like Dean Huffman — begin to think independently of the prevailing political thought in our colleges and universities, the thought police are put on full alert, outrage is expressed, and lawsuits are threatened.

How’d you like to have this guy for your boss? Your “academic freedom” stretches only so far as Commandant Klonoff allows.

Dean Klonoff missed a golden opportunity to take the high ground and denounce any instance – regardless of political perspective — where the law school’s “good name” may have been used for a political purpose. Klonoff could have set the Lewis & Clark College of Law apart as an institution where everyone’s free speech rights would be respected.

Instead, Klonoff chose to go after the speech he disagreed with. Stephen Colbert would be proud.

Catch all the great Looking Forward articles here: Here

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn Post to Reddit

Posted by at 06:00 | Posted in Measure 37 | 4 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • John Fairplay

    Well, there’s one more institution of higher learning any future kids of mine won’t attend.

  • Actual Free Speech Advocate

    Great exposé, but get a PDF made of the Lewis & Clark’s website with the Kroger announcement posted there before they remove it. These folks have all attended the Sandy Burglar school of cover up. Perhaps the school may need to show up on a C&E report if it’s materially supporting the Kroger campaign? Of course Bill Bradbury will just race to investigate that. If any concrete instances of discrimination of non-liberals is found at Lewis & Clark, perhaps FIRE (Foundation for Individual Rights in Education can get involved. One more thing, everyone needs to go to and sign up to get a screening of the independent film by the same name that dramatically documents this same academic corruption across the country.

  • WayneO

    Um, dude. OIA sent that letter BROADLY and it was a big scam trying to fool the electorate. You’ve done it before with other front groups (with Oregon Family Farm Association, etc.) and you’ll keep doing it.

    The Kroger announcement and Yes on 49 events at Lewis and Clark were minor, unnoticed events that had no impact. Kroger’s announcement was covered in the paper, and had no indication that Lewis and Clark College supported him.

    Klonoff went after the speech that was widely misinterpreted, not every last bit of speech buried somewhere on a website.

  • Pingback: réplique rolex occasion paris()

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)