Senator Starr proposes overhaul of redistricting process

Press release from Senator Bruce Starr

Senator Starr proposes overhaul of redistricting process

Broad support for a bi-partisan commission

Salem, OR — State Senator Bruce Starr (R-Hillsboro) has proposed a new plan to make the way Oregon draws new legislative districts bi-partisan, objective and fair. Starr will introduce the plan before the 2009 Legislative Assembly.

“This plan takes the politics out of the redistricting process so neither party can play kingmaker with Oregon’s representatives,” said Starr. “Past redistricting plans have been used by political parties to create grossly gerrymandered districts that look more like Rorschach inkblots than legislative districts. Our state has a great legacy of fairness, and our redistricting process should eliminate any possibility for partisan games so that our elective districts are drawn with the best interests of voters at heart.”

Starr’s plan calls for a commission of five to draw new district boundaries every ten years. The commission will consist of two appointees each from the minority and majority parties of the legislature. The fifth member, a non-voting chairman, will be elected by a majority vote of the commission members. No past or presently elected official will serve on the commission.

The plan also stipulates fair and object criteria for drawing the new districts. Each district will be nearly equal in population, compact, and separated from other districts by logical boundaries such as geographical features, artificial barriers or existing political lines. The map will be drawn so as not to favor or discriminate against any political party or group.

The legislature is given power to amend the redistricting plan, but only with a two-thirds vote.

“This plan puts voters first and politicians second when it comes to redistricting,” said Starr. “That’s the type of politics that represents the Oregon I know.”

The Public Commission on the Oregon Legislature, a bi-partisan group tasked with making suggestions for a more effective legislature, recommended the creation of a Redistricting Commission as a fundamental change needed in Oregon government. The Commission’s Blueprint for a 21st Century Legislature recommended “a process that is staffed by skilled professionals, overseen by a stae official with no political stake in the outcome, and may result in plans that are more fair and can be prepared more efficiently.”

Starr is submitting his redistrict plan for drafting and introduction in the 2009 legislative session. Oregon is due to re-draw district lines in 2011.


  • Jerry

    Sounds fair. Sounds bi-partisan. What could be wrong with it?

  • Anon

    Gee, Starr’s party loses control of the Legislature and –bingo! — NOW he thinks that redistricting should be taken away from legislative control. Fascinating.

    • Abraxia

      Two words for you, Anon: Jeff Duyck.

  • anon

    Starzz a frontrunner ie: Jessica’s law, and still needs to explain why he talked Mary Gallegos into voting for the largest tax increase in Oregon history in 2003.
    08/20 (H) House concurred in Senate amendments and repassed bill, having received the required three-fifths Constitutional majority. Ayes, 36 *Including Gallegos;* Nays, 22–Anderson, Brown, Butler, Close, Doyle, Flores, Garrard, Gilman, Kitts, Knopp, Krieger, Kropf, Krummel, Kruse, Miller, Nelson, Richardson, Scott, Smith G., Smith P., Smith T., Speaker Minnis; Absent, 1–Zauner.

  • Anon


    Jeff Duyck’s situation had NOTHING to do with the current redistricting process. Duyck’s problem is that Washington County screwed up assigning his home to the correct district. Starr’s proposal wouldn’t do a thing to stop Washington County from making the same error again in the future.

  • AJ526

    This is a good idea by Starr. We should have done this much earlier. What happens in the current system is the Legislatur and Governor come up with plans, and if they cant agree, then the SoS draws the lines. When we have uber-partisans like Bradbury or Brown taking control, itl eaves us with very partisan, sometimes laughable districts.

  • John in Oregon

    Anon said > *Gee, Starr’s party loses control of the Legislature and –bingo! — NOW he thinks that redistricting should be taken away from legislative control. Fascinating.*

    Anon you clearly do not understand the process. Take a look at the news from 2001. *Since the legislature missed the original July 1 deadline, the _Secretary of State, Bill Bradbury_ released a final redistricting plan on August 15, 200.*

    The Democrats legislative minority with the backing of a Democrat Govenor only needed to delay so Democrat Bradbury imposed his plan. Put the mess at the proper door. The Secretary of States office door.

    Does the mess need to be fixed, in a word, yes.