The Statesman Journal reported on what is before the Oregon Supreme Court,
“This case involves Thomas Gregory Machuca of West Linn, whose blood was drawn after a June 1, 2005, crash in Portland but who failed to persuade a trial judge to suppress evidence of his blood alcohol level. (It was 0.20 percent, above the legal limit of 0.08 percent.) He said it violated his state constitutional right against unreasonable searches and seizures….But Kroger said that if police were required to obtain search warrants before drawing blood from drunken-driving suspects, delays could result in samples with blood-alcohol content “declining minute by minute,” although Gartlan disagreed…”Consent is a personal right,” Gartlan told the court. “What the Legislature has attempted to do is to take that right away.”
The result may have big implications on Oregon law. What will happen? Does your blood carry certain rights, private infromation, civil liberties?