Let your voices be heard on 6 bills targeting ‘kicker’ refund

Sen Doug Whitsett

by Sen. Doug Whitsett

The income tax kicker is Oregon’s only spending limitation

Oregon’s March economic and revenue forecast was released last week. The forecast predicts that the state will receive enough revenue, during the remainder of this budget cycle, to trigger the personal income tax “kicker.”

The “kicker” is a refund of excess income taxes paid by Oregon taxpayers. State economists estimate the refund will total $349 million, about $350 for each Oregon family of four.

“Kicker” refunds will no longer be mailed to taxpayers in the form of a refund check. The refund process was changed by the passage of House Bill 3543 during the 2011 session.

The refund would now take the form of a tax credit, applied to the 2016 income tax return. This change was allegedly made to save the state the cost of creating and mailing the refund checks to Oregon taxpayers. It also allows the state to have the use of the money for several more months before refunding it to its rightful owners.

The personal income tax “kicker” is found in Oregon’s Constitution. That constitutional amendment was adopted by the people through the passage of Measure 86 in the 2000 general election.

Its primarily purpose is to function as a state government spending limit. It serves to prevent the state government from spending excess money, collected FROM the taxpayers, by refunding it TO the taxpayers.

At the end of each Legislative Assembly, the state issues an official revenue forecast that predicts how much money the state will receive in income taxes during the next two years. The next state budgets are generally built around that forecast.

The Constitutional Amendment requires that whenever actual state income tax revenue exceeds the amount of the official forecast, by two percent or more, the entire amount of revenue collected in excess of the forecasted amount must be refunded to the people.

The most recent “end of session” forecast predicted that the state would collect about $1.5 billion more income tax revenue than ever before in Oregon history.

Oregon’s economy has improved since that prediction, at least in some areas of the state. The March forecast now predicts that the state will collect about $1.8 billion more than ever before.

The “kicker” refund will act as a spending limitation, exactly as it was intended to perform. It will reduce that excess revenue to “only” the $1.5 billion that was predicted at the end of session.

The refund will return about $350 million to the private economy, where it can be invested to help enhance the free market expansion of our economy.

But not all legislators are celebrating the triggering of the income tax “kicker.”  Some believe that the state can put all of that money to better use than the working families who actually paid the taxes.

No less than six bills have been introduced that would either eliminate the personal income tax kicker or “repurpose” the refund. Each bill would result in the retention of the money for use by state government.

The corporate income tax kicker was successfully “repurposed” by the passage of Measure 85, a constitutional amendment of the people, in the November 2012 general election. The “alleged” reason was to channel all of that money into K-12 education. In reality, the amendment simply rechanneled the money into the state General Fund to be spent on educating our children. Absolutely nothing prevents the Legislature from reducing K-12 General Fund appropriations for education an equal amount, because General Fund money can be spent for ANY purpose.

Many politicians believe that it is “political suicide” to introduce legislation that directly changes the income tax “kicker” refunds. For that reason, their efforts to abolish the income tax refund are exclusively focused on introducing resolutions to refer ballot measure to the people to decide.

Legislators then write ballot titles, summaries and explanations that are carefully crafted to encourage the people to forgo their tax refunds for the “greater public good.” In the past, they have also included clauses that expressly prohibit review of the language by either the Attorney General or the Oregon Supreme Court.

Please remember: the income tax kicker is Oregon’s only spending limitation. Its removal will allow your state government to spend every dime of your income tax money that it can collect.

The bills pertaining to the “kicker” are as follows:

Senate Joint Resolution 2 refers to the citizens for the next regular general election, in November 2016, an amendment to the state Constitution to transfer the personal “kicker” to the state’s K-12 school fund.

House Joint Resolution 6 establishes a Stability Fund with revenues from capital gains and estate taxes. It also requires that an amount equal to one percent of the General Fund appropriations for the biennium be transferred from the Stability Fund to the Rainy Day Fund, with the remainder to be transferred to the State School Fund. It transfers all moneys in the Stability Fund to the Rainy Day Fund if General Fund revenues exceed forecasts by two percent or more, which is the condition that triggers the “kicker” credit going to taxpayers. HJR 6 reduces the amount of transfer to the Rainy Day Fund and transfers the remaining moneys in the Stability Fund to the General Fund if the revenue forecast projects revenues at least two percent below estimates.

HJR 7 contains many of the same provisions as HJR 6, but refers this amendment to citizens for the November 2016 general election.

HJR 8 is also a referral, and proposes an amendment to repeal the provisions in the state Constitution pertaining to individual income “kickers.”

HJR 18 is yet another referral and would amend the Constitution to limit “kicker” rebates to $500 per taxpayer and transferring the corporate kicker in order to establish the Oregon Fund.

Finally, HJR 19 would direct the Department of Revenue to calculate the average revenue received over the two previous years from personal income and corporate excise taxpayers, state the amount received during the current biennium and transfer the excess, if it’s over the calculated average, to the Oregon Rainy Day Fund. This would also require a Constitutional amendment and a vote of the people in the November 2016 election.

A public hearing has already been held on SJR 2, but it is still very early in the legislative process. Fortunately, the legislative website, www.oregonlegislature.gov, contains a wealth of information about all of the bills, committees and much more. It even allows the opportunity to view committee meetings live, in real time, from literally anywhere in the world.

Our Constitutional republic is contingent upon citizen participation. I would strongly urge you all to take part in this legislative session to let your voices be heard in Salem.

Senator Doug Whitsett is the Republican state senator representing Senate District 28 – Klamath Falls

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn Post to Reddit

Posted by at 05:00 | Posted in OR 78th Legislative Session, State Taxes | 11 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • Bob Clark

    My two legislative persons are Representative Nosse and Senator Rosenbaum. Both of them come from the ranks of the public employee unions, or receive most all of their campaign funding from SEIU and OEA; and so, I find it totally useless to try and write them. I’ll try, but I am not going to put a lot of time into it.

    • CherryAnn1000

      I know, Bob. I have, ugh, Peter Courtney and Betty Komp, a career politico who should have retired 30 years ago, and an educator. Just how lucky can one get?

  • wfecht

    Bob you take at least 10 of your friends that feel as you do and go visit your reps at their office and ask why they are raising your taxes. Make it perssonal. do this multiple times and they may get the message. or organize one large and divide it into groups of ten to go visit the appropriate offices at different times. ask the question why are you raising our taxes? then record and publish the answer. get their answer into the public eye. I heard this strategy on the radio program I spy In Salem.
    There are only three things the current regime wants to do, raise taxes, raise taxes, raise taxes. Ultimately they want more government control to buy votes. If they can take enough from everybody and then gift back to select groups then they get reelected. by gifting I mean tax rebates, tax credits, free food, free meals, free lodging, more restrictions on non-union labor, increasing pay backs or awarding more lucrative contracts for companies that hire union labor for government contracts. you and I are not in the group receiving gifts.
    and for those of you out there want to create a rainy day fund from the kicker. or why not gather up all your friends and give your own kicker to put into the rainy day fund and leave the rest of us out of it. why not got to your legislator and tell them to create it under the current system? Oh, that means budget cuts to put money into the rainy day fund, and you are not about less government spending. you feel only the government knows how best to spend you money.

    • Eric Blair

      Fantastic idea! I, and 10 of my friends, will visit every representative and senator who doesn’t believe that AGW is a serious issue and put them on the spot. Ask them why they don’t care about what kind of polluted and devastated country we give to my granddaughter, or her granddaughter. Ask them why they give a good talk about family wage jobs, but oppose raising the minimum wage. Perfect. 🙂

      • guest

        Your Kampf is passé delusional, Mr Delusional Goebbels.

    • CherryAnn1000

      I am constantly writing these folks to tell them raising taxes is NOT the answer, but cutting state government certainly is. Do they care? Goodnight, no! All Dims have is tunnel vision, and that vision is focused on fleecing as much of our hard earned money as they can.

  • Sally

    We need the Oregon fund,
    before our work is done.
    we must provide for the poor,
    and others who have been shown the door.
    can’t work, won’t work, what difference does it make?
    we must care for them and can’t hesitate.
    They need our help and we can provide,
    if we keep the kicker money set aside.
    for those in need in tough, tough times.
    for those who want to spend our dimes,
    rather than care for just themselves.
    they look to the dems and government elves,
    to help them out when they need it most,
    which is every day so it will cost!
    Cost plenty indeed my sorry friends,
    the kicker now officially ends!!

    • .

      Maneuver sewer assigned, ~ Sally Froth Malady!

  • fred291

    CA has a Democratic Gov. and a large Democratic majority in the legislature, but what Gov. Brown (CA) asked the legislature to put on the Ballot was a proposal that in some ways looks like the kicker, it limits state spending growth to the growth trend in state revenue. Then if actual revenue comes in above expectations, the funds are used to retire state debt. That makes more sense to me than episodic tax cuts, which is what our kicker does. This is a good deal, better than the proposals above, and consistent with the recommendations of the Legislative Task Force to Restructure Revenue.

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)