Will Independent Party of Oregon retain major party status?

NW Spotlight_thb

by NW Spotlight

The Independent Party of Oregon (IPO) achieved major party status in February 2015. The IPO qualified by having enough registered IPO voters to reach the 5% threshold of the total voters registered for the November 2014 election.

The Statesman Journal reported at the time “Oregon has become the only state in the country with three major political parties,” with the IPO joining the Republican and Democratic parties as major political parties in Oregon.

Becoming a major party allowed the IPO to participate in primary elections.

Last August the IPO qualified as a major party for the 2016 elections. In this 2016 Oregon Primary, the IPO has two candidates for governor, two for US senator, one for US representative (3rd District), one for state treasurer (Chris Telfer), one for Oregon secretary of state, one for state senator and 9 for state representative.

The challenge of hanging on to major party status

When the IPO achieved major party status in February 2016, it cleared the 5% threshold by just 3 voters – Oregon had 2,188,286 voters in February 2015.

The Bend Bulletin reported last August “Party leaders believe it may be difficult to maintain major party status when the next secretary of state certifies parties after the 2016 election. That’s when the estimated 300,000 new voters will be registered automatically through the state’s pioneering universal voter registration law.” Sal Peralta, secretary and one of three main leaders of the Independent Party, was quoted “Once (automatic voter registration) kicks in, it almost certainly kicks us back to minor party status.”

Voter registration numbers from the two most recent months in 2016 are validating Peralta’s prediction so far.

The IPO had 5.01% of registered voters in February, but then dropped to 4.87% of registered voters in March and dropped further to 4.55% of registered voters in April.

UPDATE (h/t HBguy): Based on the reader comment from HBguy on some actions taken in the 2016 ‘short session’, we reached out to Sal Peralta, IPO Secretary. Sal confirmed the information from HBguy:

“It is true that Motor Voter threatens the existence of several third parties, including the Greens, Libertarians, etc.

It is true that the R’s and IPO worked to pass a ‘temporary fix’ from the impact of motor voter on the state’s small parties and it seems unlikely that the D’s would have allowed the full fixes to move if the Senate R’s had not dug in their heels. 

The Senate Republicans were absolute champions for the smaller parties during the special session.  Every one of them signed on to a letter asking the D leadership to move both bills to protect third parties.

The ‘fix’ basically sets the denominator for how ballot access is calculated to the 2014 ‘pre-motor voter’ level through the 2018 election.  However, some of the small parties have already fallen below the 2014 level for ballot access and because of motor voter will have to struggle just to get back to the 2014 membership levels so it was really just a partial stay of execution.

I suspect that IPO will retain major party status at least through 2018, but we still have some work to do.”

The bills were SB 1501 and SB 1599:

SB 1501 (Relating to calculation for maintaining status as a minor political party) – passed & signed by the governor

SB 1599 (Establishes July 1, 2015, as date for determination of total number of registered electors in this state for purpose of maintaining status as major political party through 2018 general election) – passed & signed by the governor

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn Post to Reddit

Posted by at 05:38 | Posted in 2016 Election, Voting | 9 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • Bob Clark

    If Avakian wins the Secretary of State of Oregon office, forget about things like alternative independent party. Competition to state governance from other than Avakian’s public employee union owned Democrat party will be done, until the state has an implosion.

    • Native Intelligence

      Proper to see Avakian challenged from within the Democrat party.

      Hope he’s evicted in the May primary by a technical knockout.

      As evidenced, his unauthorized misjudgment causing a nasty black eye and a removal from the Democrat party corner…a better thrilla in a manila envelope with a pink slip addressed to his travesty.

  • HBguy

    The IPO will retain it’s major party status for the 2018 election regardless of number of members.
    Yes, motor voter endangered the IPO’s major party status for 2018. But, it also endangered the actual existence of a couple of minor parties as well. Including the Working Families Party which is a union funded Democratic friendly minor political party. Motor voter was an existential threat to the WFP.
    So, in the 2016 short session, the Dem’s proposed legislation that would “fix” the problem for the WFP, but no other parties.
    Then some GOP leaders, working with IPO leadership, introduced legislation that “saved” all political parties from the impacts of motor voter on their status until 2020. Making the GOP the champions for Democracy, and infuriating the WFP and Dem. insiders who hoped that they could shield their allies from motor voter while punishing the IPO.
    An interesting inside baseball story.

    • barttels

      Not aware of the legislation that saved the IPO for another two years.

      Was that the one bright spot in this awful short session?

      • HBguy

        It was certainly a big win for the IPO. And the only reason it occurred is because IPO and GOP leadership worked together for good policy. The Dem’s would have killed it and only saved their political ally, but they knew they could’t vote against it once the GOP used one of their priority bills, because it would make them look bad. Almost like they were…antidemocratic.
        This is a good example of the IPO’s strategy of working with either D’s or R’s on best policies.
        Imagine a few IPO legislators teaming up with some GOP legislators in opposition to IP-28. Or IPO legislators teaming up with some moderate Dem’s to force modification of the worst of the green energy projects. (An alliance some GOP legislators may not be able to take due to potential primary challenge that could occur if they worked in any way with Dems)

        • barttels

          Thanks. It’s too bad in Oregon when aisle-crossing runs a risk of a challenge from the further wing, because all in all that’s not playing well here. I’d settle for Oregon achieving a little more purple. Oregon’s shades of blue and green are sort of like blue-green algae. Toxic.

          Holding my breath till after the SOS election. I registered in the DP just to try to help derail Avakian in the primary. I’ll be back to the IPO shortly. Thrilled they’ve been saved for another two years. I had totally missed that story. (There sure isn’t half the news in the O that there used to be, is there. Maybe it was there but 80% of it now just seems to be junk.)

      • Conservatively Speaking

        Write on. And yes, please cancel the Dem EMERGENCY callouses warping up Oregon skins game Finger-dings.

  • 博文值得拜读。受益了!

  • 研究研究,学习学习。

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)