Blumenauer asks supporters not to talk

Congressman Blumenauer in the news
John in Oregon

As the lame duck waddled out of Washington DC last week the midnight lights were burning in the halls of bureaucracy. One of the first orders of business was seasons greetings from Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and the folks at Health and Human Services. Under a new rule, the federal government will now decide what counts as an unreasonable health insurance rate increase. As the Wall Street Journal noted:

This is all an effort to end-run Congress, which by some miracle declined to give HHS the formal legal authority to explicitly block premium increases, despite a direct appeal from President Obama. Instead, Ms. Sebelius is creating by regulatory fiat larger de facto powers to achieve the same end.

In other late night work HHS reopened a proposal to implement end-of-life planning which earlier touched off a political death panel firestorm. The proposal was dropped from the legislation to overhaul the health care system. The New York Times reports the Obama administration will achieve the same goal by regulation. The Times article quotes Representative Blumenauer:

Mr. Blumenauer, the author of the original end-of-life proposal, praised the rule as “a step in the right direction.”

After learning of the administration’s decision, Mr. Blumenauer’s office celebrated “a quiet victory,” but urged supporters not to crow about it.

“While we are very happy with the result, we won’t be shouting it from the rooftops because we aren’t out of the woods yet,” Mr. Blumenauer’s office said in an e-mail in early November to people working with him on the issue. “This regulation could be modified or reversed, especially if Republican leaders try to use this small provision to perpetuate the ‘death panel’ myth.”

Moreover, the e-mail said: “We would ask that you not broadcast this accomplishment out to any of your lists, even if they are ‘supporters’ — e-mails can too easily be forwarded.”

The e-mail continued: “Thus far, it seems that no press or blogs have discovered it, but we will be keeping a close watch and may be calling on you if we need a rapid, targeted response. The longer this goes unnoticed, the better our chances of keeping it.”

Thanks Congressman for keeping the lid on so controversy won’t disrupt people during the holidays. Keeping a secret in the lame duck session and for nearly two months in Washington DC is remarkable. One wonders what other regulations are being discussed in the back office, behind closed doors. As the Journal noted of these regulatory decisions:

This discretion is typical of the vast ad hoc powers that ObamaCare handed to regulators.

tt twitter big4 Blumenauer asks supporters not to talk tt digg big4 Blumenauer asks supporters not to talk tt facebook big4 Blumenauer asks supporters not to talk tt reddit big4 Blumenauer asks supporters not to talk

Posted by at 05:00 | Posted in Uncategorized | 15 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • Jacklordgod

    If the new Republican House had any sense they would go after these regulatory end runs around congress. Unelected bureaucrats are about as unpopular a target as you can pick, and this administrations publicly stated intent to abuse the political process through regulatory overstep would be a relatively risk free target. Of course this would require The Stupid Party to actually use some sense and whether or not that will happen come January remains to be seen.

  • Elvsy3k

    So, the EPA, the FCC and now HHS should be taken to task by the new GOP controlled House. Maybe yanking their respective purse strings while hitting them with congressional hearings and swamping them in legal paperwork. Meantime, businesses can take them to court.

    This is what Tea Partiers and Americans for Prosperity should be asking of the House now. I don’t want to bank on the 2012 election to get rid of Bama and his bad business ideas.

    • Valid

      Yes, God forbid that regulators should side with American consumers rather than the poor, downtrodden insurance industry.

      • Steve Plunk

        Regulators more often side with their own interests over the American consumer. Spend a little time observing government and you will see their biggest concern is themselves. Besides this is not about that, it’s about government secrecy in policy making. Don’t liberals believe in such transparency anymore?

  • Rob DeHarpport

    What else should we expect from Mr. Bow tie? Yes, it’s time for Congress to stop these “end-runs” and make themselves actually relevant. These agencies are doing the dirty work for Obama/ Blumenauer socialist agenda, and continuing to harm rather help the economy by piling on more & more regulations and tying up natural resources. I’m very anxious to see the 112th Congress in action. Our future is truly in their hands.

    • Valid

      Of course! Because we all know how good lax regulations on offshore drilling have been for the U.S. economy.

      • Valid

        “Let’s de-regulate Wall Street” (banking collapse). “Let’s de-regulate the sale of energy” (Enron). “Let’s deregulate offshore drilling” (BP oil spill).

        Exactly how big do the disasters need to get before you realize that leaving multi-billion dollar corporate monopolies unregulated is at the root of each of the biggest economic problems we’ve had over the last two decades.

        • Oregoniris

          Yes big goverments are never full of corruption and waste and fraud and oh yeah oppression..

          • Valid

            Iris – Unless you are a black person who lived through desegregation or a Japanese person who was put into an internment camp, and you think you are being oppressed by our government, it is a virtual certainty that you don’t actually know what oppression really is.

            As for corruption and waste… why would government corruption and waste would excuse the devastation caused by Enron, BP, et al?

        • Steve Plunk

          In each of the example you give government regulators failed to do their job. We don’t need more regulations we need proper regulation and accountability for government malfeasance in doing their job. Keep blaming business like all the other libs but understand who actually creates wealth in this country and without that wealth where we would be.

        • Rupert in Springfield

          Could we have one, I mean just one liberal who will actually give Obama some of the blame for BP?

          BP gave Obama a huge pile of cash and in return not only got kid glove treatment from regulators but also stood to benefit handsomely from Obamas proposed opening of offshore gulf drilling, but natch only in areas where BP had major lease rights.

          Just once Id like to see a liberal be honest on this issue and hold the administration accountable rather than excuse or deflect. Will we ever get that? Nope.

          All we will ever get is either an attempt to blame conservativbes, such as we see here, or the mealy mouthed “oh yeah well maybe this, but Bush was way worse with that” blame shifting.

          Obama was wrong – he took incredible amounts of money from BP, we saw the favouritism that bought in terms of regulation and proposed oil drilling expansion and not one liberal ever said boo about it and not one ever will.

          Non questioning of the leadership and excusing of any error no matter how grievous is the cornerstone of liberalism. This is precisely why it is such a scary doctrine.

          • valley person

            I’m a liberal and sure, I give a portion of the blame for the BP mess to Obama. He was warned when he came into office that the minerals Management Service was a corrupted mess and he and Salazar waited far too long to clean that up. That may or may not have contributed to the blowout.

            But, any way you look at it this was a private company that poked a hole in the floor of the ocean, screwed up, and unleashed the worst oil spill in history. And this came after years of messed up safety procedures by BP management. Blaming the government for not stopping them is a bit silly if you are also favoring deregulation at the same time.

            As for Obama taking money from BP. That is politics. Do you favor full public financing of campaigns with no allowance for corporate or labor contributions?

  • Ike

    Well, gee-golly. Since Obamacare did NOTHING to address the rising costs of healthcare (actually, it’s an oxymoron in its creation of so much bureaucracy), with the ceiling set on insurance rates, exactly what will happen to ‘healthcare’?
    Likely similar to that which is happening to the dollar.

    If you read that question and still believe in this garbage, you deserve what’s coming down the pike and, trust me…you’ll know what it’s like to be looking up the barrel of a gun as you’re trying to beg/borrow/steal/loot when the government fails to feed you…

    • Steve Plunk

      That’s the thing Ike, no efforts are being made to control costs. It’s all about getting people to put more money into the system. Unless costs are controlled we will soon run out of money.

  • Dominic

    There are enough conservative voters out here to get these people out of office and nullify the metropolitan power(s).

    C’mon Oregon, get out and vote!

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)