Editorials reveal union anti-petition strategy

Two great editorials were written this week to demonstrate how nasty the government union forces are acting to stop pro-taxpayer measures from getting to the ballot. The Las Vegas Review Journal wrote about nationwide harassment of petitioners by union groups (article here). The Bend Bulletin talked about the unhelpful motives behind Oregon’s union effort to stop petitions from reaching the ballot (article here) .

Here is some great excerpts from the two articles…

Las Vegas Review Journal 6/29/06
“The Associated Press reports that, “Organizers of a petition drive aimed at capping state spending in Nebraska are suing three cities, alleging they have been obstructing the effort and interfering with free speech.”

In their zeal to quash spending caps, according to the allegations, officials in Omaha, Lincoln and Grand Island — three of the Nebraska’s four largest cities — have tried to stop petition supporters from gathering signatures in public parks, on sidewalks and streets, and outside public facilities.

Sound familiar? Similar tactics were used in 2004 against petitioners in Nevada seeking to drum up support for proposals to ban public employees from serving in the Legislature and repeal record tax increases passed by lawmakers in 2003.

And those circulating TASC petitions in Las Vegas this month had to fend off members of a public employee union-backed group hoping to intimidate voters into not signing.”

Bend Bulletin 6/29/06
“Our Oregon is miffed about a scheme used by Arno Political Consultants, which doesn’t exactly pay petitioners by the signature but comes darned close. According to an Associated Press account, Arno pays more productive petitioners a higher per-hour rate than less-productive petitioners, and it also pays bonuses to those who collect a certain number of signatures. The Elections Division initially OK’d Arno’s payment scheme, according to the AP, but expressed “fresh concerns” last week….

So why are Nesbitt, Lowe and Our Oregon so incensed? To understand that, it helps to know who they are. Nesbitt and Lowe are the chief sponsors of the 2002 ballot measure that created the law Arno might be skirting. Though we supported Ballot Measure 26 at the time, we wonder in retrospect whether it was such a great idea….

But was Measure 26 really about fraud? Probably not. Paying petitioners by the signature may provide an incentive to commit fraud, which is why we supported it. But it’s something else as well: a powerful incentive to collect lots of signatures legitimately, which is undoubtedly why unions hated it. After all, the folks employing all those signature-gatherers were often pushing anti-union ballot measures….It’s no surprise the petition campaigns about which Our Oregon is now fuming are pushing measures unions don’t like, including one to reinstate term limits and another to limit state spending.”

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn Post to Reddit

Posted by at 07:00 | Posted in Measure 37 | 4 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • Anonymous

    one thing great about opinion pieces is that they don’t require actual facts – only opinions.

  • When people are harassed, niether facts nor opinions matter much.


    Nothing would make me happier than to see some of these partisan union hacks such as Patty Wentz or Tim Nesbitt have something horrible happen to them. They simply want nothing more than to promote the union agenda without regards for anybody or anything else.
    Screw them and the rest of these union SCUM!

  • Anonymous

    wow, there you have it: compassionate conservativism. nice. perhaps if you could see outside of your horse blinds you’d see he’s actually trying to work in the interest of those who he represents, working families. you may not like unions… but real people make up their membership. and they want a fair and decent wage, insurance, and a pension just like you and everyone else. how terrible that someone would wish tragedy on someone like that. you’re so full of hate it would be impossible to talk reasonably or rationally to you. scary.

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)