ConCare: Oregon Dems push to make private insurance pay for jail inmates

ConCare logo_thb

by NW Spotlight

Rep. Mitch Greenlick (D-Portland) is driving HB 4110 through the Oregon Legislature with strong support from Democrats in the House and Senate. The bill is attempting to shift some jail health care costs from county budgets to Oregonians who pay for health insurance.

Currently, once someone in Oregon goes to jail (county jail) – federal health care programs stop (Veterans Benefits, Medicaid, Medicare), state benefits stop (Oregon Health Plan) and private insurance coverage stops. The jail health care costs are then paid for out of county sheriff’s budgets, which already are stretched thin.

So of all of the types of health benefits and health insurance that stop when someone goes to jail, HB 4110 only picks on Oregonians who pay for health insurance. It doesn’t even make changes to benefits stopping for people on the Oregon Health Plan.

The bill appears to be an attempt to get some financial relief to counties, but solely on the backs of Oregonians with private health insurance. It’s really a back door way to tax people with private health insurance – one more hidden way to make Oregonians’ insurance premiums go up.

A much better approach would be to get meaningful revenue to counties through job growth or by reducing county costs by doing more meaningful PERS reform, eliminating unfunded state mandates, etc. There are a number of ideas for stimulating job growth, including reducing barriers to using Oregon’s natural resources like timber.

Increasing Oregonian’s health insurance premiums isn’t the right approach, and it’s not fair to Oregonians who pay for their health insurance.

  • Bob Clark

    I doubt most people in Greenlick’s district even understand he’s their representative. How else does someone continually get a way with pinching the majority of those in his district, not to mention the rest of us.

  • conseratively speaking

    HB 4110 should never get out of committee, on the other hand, Greenlick considered for an invitation to get out of the legislature.

  • Jack Lord God

    Once you accept the premise that the irresponsible are entitled to the same things as the responsible – you have accepted the consequence that the responsible must now work twice as hard, both to support themselves as well as the irresponsible.

    The corollary of this is it is not the irresponsible who are at fault. It is the responsible who granted them all the benefits of work without asking for effort. Which was an irresponsible act by the responsible.

    • Jack Lord God

      In other words – it would be nice to see the same effort devoted to making the irresponsible finally take responsibility for their lives rather than continually asking the responsible to work harder.

      Of course that would take effort on peoples part in who they elect. Coming up with real solutions is a hell of a lot harder than simply slapping another tax on people.