Act One: Merkley Cuts Medicare

Dr Monica Wehby_thb

Dr. Monica Wehby for U.S. Senate

Sen. Merkley Champions Medicare, Cuts It, Champions It, Then Attacks Wehby

Portland – Hypocrisy is the scarlet letter of modern day politics, and Jeff Merkley is wearing it. From Main Street to Wall Street, Senator Merkley’s actions rarely match his rhetoric. Saying one thing, and doing another is the recipe by which Merkley and his political cohorts hold on to power, proving his allegiance lies not with the people of Oregon, but rather D.C. special interests.

The first act of hypocrisy we’ve caught Senator Merkley in is his outspoken support for Medicare and outlandish attacks on Monica Wehby, despite his own votes to cut the program and the benefits seniors rely on.

Like so many politicians before him, Jeff Merkley took winning a seat in Congress to mean he could do whatever he so pleased, and that included breaking his promise to protect Medicare for our seniors. While protecting Medicare on the campaign trail may be beneficial to a candidate, Jeff Merkley saw that cutting it could also be a means to an end, once elected.

Since taking office, Jeff Merkley’s record protecting Medicare has been less than stellar, voting on three separate occasions against preventing cuts to Medicare Advantage and once for one of the biggest cuts in Medicare history. His justification? Passing Obamacare…

Obamacare isn’t feasible without massive cuts to the Medicare program, and so Merkley did what he had to do to get legislation he called “historic” passed.

Despite Oregon having one of the highest percentages of Medicare Advantage enrollees in the nation, Jeff Merkley voted against efforts to prevent Medicare Advantage cuts or allow Medicare Advantage enrollees to keep their existing coverage under Obamacare:

  • In December 2009, Merkley Voted AGAINST A Motion That Would Have Prevented Medicare Cuts In The Bill, Including Cuts To Medicare Advantage (H.R. 3590, Vote #358: Motion rejected 42-58: R 40-0; D 2-56; I 0-2, 12/3/09, Merkley Voted Nay) 
  • In December 2009, Merkley Voted AGAINST A Motion That Would Have Allowed Medicare Advantage Enrollees To Retain Their Existing Benefits (H.R. 3590, Vote #370: Rejected 42-57: R 40-0; D 2-55; I 0-2, 12/8/09, Merkley Voted Nay) 
  • In March 2010, Merkley Voted To KILL An Amendment That Would Have Prevented Cuts To Medicare Advantage (H.R. 4872, Vote #72: Motion agreed to 56-42: R 0-40; D 54-2; I 2-0, 3/24/10, Merkley Voted Yea)

Furthermore, Merkley’s vote for Obamacare was a thumbs up to raiding Medicare to pay for new programs created by the ACA:

  • In March 2010, Mr. Merkley voted for Obamacare, which cut $716 billion from Medicare to pay for Obamacare (H.R. 4872, Vote #105: Passed 56-43: D 54-3; R 0-40; I 2-0, 3/25/10, Merkley voted Yea; Congressional Budget Office, Letter To Speaker John Boehner, 7/24/12)

Jeff Merkley’s support of these cuts could have serious consequences:

  • According to the CBO, the payment cuts in Medicare include:
  • A $260 billion payment cut for hospital services.
  • A $39 billion payment cut for skilled nursing services.
  • A $17 billion payment cut for hospice services.
  • A $66 billion payment cut for home health services.
  • A $33 billion payment cut for all other services.
  • A $156 billion cut in payment rates in Medicare Advantage (MA); $156 billion is before considering interactions with other provisions. The House Ways and Means Committee was able to include interactions with other provisions, estimating the cuts to MA to be even higher, coming in at $308 billion.
  • $56 billion in cuts for disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payments.* DSH payments go to hospitals that serve a large number of low-income patients.
  • $114 billion in other provisions pertaining to Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP* (does not include coverage-related provisions). ( 8/1/12, Daily Signal)
  • Less Access to Services “…If Obamacare’s major reductions are implemented by Congress over the coming decade, seniors’ ability to access Medicare services will surely diminish. In fact, the Medicare Trustees project that the lower Medicare payment rates would cause 15 percent of hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and home health agencies to become unprofitable by 2019, and this percentage would reach roughly 25 percent in 2030 and 40 percent by 2050.” ( 8/20/13,Heritage)
  • Less Access to Physicians “ Obamacare gives new powers to make additional cuts in Medicare through the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB)…. One of the only significant tools available to IPAB to reduce Medicare spending is to cut physician reimbursement rates…The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services released information that 9,539 physicians who had accepted Medicare opted out of the program in 2012, which is significantly more than the 3,700 who dropped out in 2009. With the ominous power of an unelected new board hanging over them, it is likely that more physicians will choose to leave the Medicare program in coming years.” (8/20/13, Heritage)
  • Increased Costs and Loss of Current Plan “…the Medicare Actuary projected that the impact of Obamacare’s cuts would be significant. …This means that these enrollees [Medicare Advantage] would have to enroll in the less generous traditional Medicare program, causing them to lose their current health plan and likely face increased out-of-pocket costs.” (8/20/13, Heritage)
  • Reduction of Benefits Oregon is estimated to see reductions in Medicare Advantage benefits between $50 and $60 per member. ( 3/1/13, America’s Health Insurance Plans)
  • Higher Premiums “According to CBO’s preliminary estimate, enacting those changes would lead to an average increase in premiums for Part D beneficiaries of about 4 percent in 2011, rising to about 9 percent in 2019.” ( 3/19/10, CBO Comparison of Projected Medicare Part D Premiums Under Current Law)

Now, fast forward to this year – an election year. Jeff Merkley again campaigns as a champion of the program, and calls for a stop to the cuts he voted for in the first place:

  • Merkley joined other vulnerable Senators in writing a letter to CMS warning of the dire consequences their cuts would make:“We write to raise serious concerns about the Medicare Advantage (MA) 2015 rate notice and the impact further cuts may have on the millions of individuals enrolled in the program,” the senators write. “We are strongly committed to preserving the high quality health plan choices and benefits that our constituents receive through the MA program. Given the impact that payment policies could have on our constituents, we ask that you prioritize beneficiaries’ experience and minimize disruption in maintaining payment levels for 2015.” (2/20/13, Letter to CMS)

Then, he attacks Monica Wehby by playing on the fears of Oregon’s seniors, lashing out at Wehby for conjectural cuts, despite his very real cuts to the Medicare program. Merkley subsequently launched a tour aimed at pitting seniors against Dr. Wehby for the very sin he committed, and so Merkley’s circle of hypocrisy is complete.

Jeff Merkley saying one thing and doing another on Medicare is emblematic of his career politician and Washington insider status. These actions serve as a sore reminder why Oregon can’t trust Jeff Merkley.

***Bonus Act of Hypocrisy***

Merkley calls himself “A Senator for all of us”, but requires seniors be on a list in order to speak with him… go figure.

Dr. Monica Wehby is currently the Director of Pediatric Neurosurgery at Randall Children’s Hospital in Portland, Oregon. Monica has nearly 30 years of experience formulating medical policy and is a mother of four.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn Post to Reddit

Posted by at 10:00 | Posted in 2014 Election, U.S. Senate | 43 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • wfecht

    This extends to Widen who stated he did not like anything in the ACA but voted for it anyway then immediately champions exceptions. and Schrader who sat in his office before the final ACA vote until sombody came to him and promised him everything would be alright if you vote for this. Nobody held to Obamas review period for understanding before the vote. nobody knew what wa in it. Just as aunt Nancy P. said must vote for it to find out what is in it. and they all keep getting reelected. we truly deserve the government we have from the police state surveillance, big bank bailouts, endless war, and international surveillance.

  • HBguy

    Politifact says this is half true. ( Though after reading the article I’d say theWehby campaign claim here is largely false.

    Unless that is Republican now believe that spending MORE on a program, but not as much as was projected to cost, is a cut.

    But isn’t that what Dem’s get criticized for all the time? Calling an increase a cut?

    More interesting to me is that most of these reductions in increases (or “cuts”), are from Medicare advantage. Lets revisit that for just a minute.

    GW Bush got Medicare Advantage passed so that private insurers could compete with Medicare. They idea was it would drive costs down. But, in order to encourage entry into the market, they’d be paid 10%-15% More than the cost of Medicare. The idea was…once the market was establishe, private prices would come down through the power of the free market. After all, private enterprise should beat a government program in cost.

    But a funny thing happened. Instead of reducing the costs, the private insurers just added a couple extra bells and whistles to their insurance products, some even designed to entice the healthir seniors to enroll with them. So, Of course seniors who have medicare advantage coverage want to keep it. and the insurers want to continue to sell it.

    If there are two things Medicare advantage program have proved its that government can deliver medical care cheaper than the private sector. And, the health insurance market may not be similar to a completely free market.

    For a taxpayer, exactly is the problem with reducing Medicare advantage reimbursement to equal the cost of a government medicare coverage? Can’t the private market compete effectively with the government?

  • Jack Lord God

    This is so disingenuous – For conservatives to win there has to be honesty. This is not it.

    Why don’t we speak the truth. You think anyone is going to believe a Republican is going to lavish fewer benefits on entitlements than a Democrat? Even if true even if the Republican wins by paying bigger benefits on entitlement programs what the hell does that mean? That the Republican can do welfare state better than the Democrat and that’s something to be proud of?

    At some point you have to stand for something. Medicare is a program that needs to be cut. All entitlement programs need to be cut. Step one – means testing. Step two, cutting this bullshit that lets scam artists advertise a knee brace on Lars Larson and saddle taxpayers with a $500 charge on an Ace bandage. Why the hell is a single black lesbian mom with ten kids, half of them Jewish the other half PutUponIsts, working at McDonalds with no health insurance to pay for grannies damn scooter chair when granny likely owns her own house?

    I am so sick of Republicans trying to outdo Democrats on who can lavish more benefits on our richest demographic, seniors. If you are trying to convince people you will spend more than Democrats, you will lose, and deservedly so. Nobody spends more than Democrats. No way no how you will beat them at that game. Try an honest debate and there might be a chance.

    • Hbguy

      Good Lord Jack! I agree with you!
      You state the principled conservative view. But it’s no longer the Republican Party position largely because the Republican Party us getting older as younger voters opt to be more libertarian and independent.

      • Jack Lord God

        True. The Republican party is dead so long as they keep running guys like Romney, who made Republicans sit out the election, and keep at the hi-jinx such as the Thad Cochran race. Offending the base is a horrendous strategy, but that is exactly what the party is doing.

  • Pingback: Wall posters()

  • Pingback: togel singapura()

  • Pingback: casino online()

  • Pingback: bandarq()

  • Pingback: domino 99()

  • Pingback: head()

  • Pingback: Digital marketing strategy()

  • Pingback: Slim couture()

  • Pingback: Slim couture()

  • Pingback: Slim couture()

  • Pingback: maharashtra 10th results 2017()

  • Pingback: Used Cooper Tires for sale()

  • Pingback: your business cant afford to skip video advertising - here's why()

  • Pingback: top 10 best cars for money of 2018()

  • Pingback: GOOSE VPN()

  • Pingback: IPVanish VPN()

  • Pingback: GOOSE VPN discount()

  • Pingback: Beste Nederlandse VPN()

  • Pingback: Pure VPN()

  • Pingback: ExpressVPN service()

  • Pingback: Express VPN()

  • Pingback: dishwasher pump repair()

  • Pingback: dishwasher repair man()

  • Pingback: microwave repair()

  • Pingback: stainless steel hollow bars()

  • Pingback: youvideoporno()

  • Pingback: 10 yard dumpster()

  • Pingback: dumpster rental near me()

  • Pingback: trash rental()

  • Pingback: dumpster rental westland()

  • Pingback: dumpster rental Shelby Twp()

  • Pingback: dumpster rental sizes()

  • Pingback: dumpster containers for rent()

  • Pingback: sell house fast()

  • Pingback: license check()

  • Pingback: run background check()

  • Pingback: employee criminal record check()

  • Pingback: criminal record report()

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)