Recent tragedies underscore misguided gun control efforts

Dan Lucas_July 2012_BW

by Dan Lucas

Several recent tragedies have underscored flaws and falsehoods inherent in gun control efforts in the U.S.

The first is the horrific murder of four Marines and a Navy sailor in Chattanooga, Tennessee, by Kuwaiti-born Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez. Abdulazeez first attacked an Armed Forces recruiting center and then a Navy and Marine reserve center. A sign on the door of the first location reads “Federal Installation – Firearms Are Prohibited In This Facility.” Photos now show that door riddled with bullet holes.

Being a gun-free zone and having a gun-free zone sign didn’t stop Abdulazeez. What did protect personnel at the recruiting center was likely the recently installed bulletproof glass. The four Marines and the sailor were killed at the second location, where the Navy Times reports “it is against Defense Department policy for anyone other than military police or law enforcement to carry weapons on federal property.”

Another recent tragedy revealed a major flaw in background checks. Back in June, Dylann Roof went in to an historic Charleston, South Carolina black church and opened fire, killing nine people in the church. Authorities described the horrific shooting by Roof, a 21-year-old white man, as a hate crime. In the weeks following the Charleston massacre, the FBI revealed that Roof should not have been able to purchase the gun he used.

USA Today called it “an extraordinary acknowledgement of cascading bureaucratic failures” by the FBI Director. A records breakdown caused the gun purchase background check to miss an arrest on felony drug charges. Because Roof had admitted to drug possession, it would have triggered an immediate denial.

This tragic failure of background checks now joins other major background check failures like the 2011 shooting of former Congresswoman Gabby Giffords and the 2007 Viginia Tech shooting where 32 people were killed. The gunmen in those shootings had also passed background checks. There was prior evidence that Gabby Giffords’ shooter was mentally unstable and the Virginia Tech shooter had been “deemed mentally ill by a judge,” and yet both were still able to pass background checks.

The final recent tragedy was when a felon illegal immigrant used a gun stolen from federal agent to murder Kate Steinle in San Francisco. Steinle had been walking on San Francisco’s popular Pier 14 with her father when she was shot. The San Jose Mercury News reported “A bullet pierced Steinle’s aorta and she collapsed to the ground in front of her father, who desperately tried to save her life.”

The accused murderer is a convicted felon who has been deported five times and was only recently released from federal prison. After federal prison, he was turned over to the San Francisco sheriff’s office, where he was wanted on felony marijuana distribution charges. San Francisco dropped the charges and released him. After the shooting, the accused murderer said “he had been taking sleeping pills and smoking pot.”

As a convicted felon and illegal immigrant, it was illegal for the accused murderer to have a gun in his possession – even if he wasn’t the one who stole the gun from the federal agent. And yet he had one, and he now stands charged of using it to murder Kate Steinle.

These gun control flaws and failures come against the backdrop of more Americans choosing to arm themselves and dropping crime rates. A new study by the Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC) reports “the number of concealed handgun permits has soared, growing from 4.6 million in 2007 to over 12.8 million [in 2015].” The same report notes this 178% increase in concealed handgun permits has been accompanied by a 25% drop in the murder rate and a 25% drop in the overall violent crime rate during the same time period.

Here in Oregon, the number of concealed handgun licenses (CHL) is up and we have a low homicide rate. The CPRC reports there are now 211,223 Oregonians who have a CHL. That’s 1 in 14 adults in Oregon who can legally carry a concealed firearm – placing Oregon well within the top half of states with the most CHLs per adult. Yet we have what The Oregonian says is a homicide rate that is “around half the national rate.” Guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens are not the problem.

The solution to preventing future tragedies isn’t more flawed gun control.

As a nation and as a state, we need to focus on things that can make a difference. That should include better detection and treatment of mental illness and drug abuse, as well as tougher sentencing to keep innocent people safe from criminals.

To read more from Dan, visit


UPDATE (7-26-2015): The Louisiana theater shooting happened after I’d submitted this column to the Salem Statesman Journal. It is still early and it seems that information around these tragedies can be sketchy and changing early on.

At this point, it looks like the Louisiana theater was a gun-free zone, the shooter had a criminal history (including an arrest for arson) and also had violent mental health issues (a judge had him involuntarily committed.) He had a restraining order taken out against him in 2008 and he was denied a concealed carry permit in 2006, and yet he still passed a background check last year when he legally purchased the gun he used in the theater shooting. All of which sadly validates points made in my column.


UPDATE (8-26-2015): An armed man murdered a TV reporter and her cameraman on live television in Roanoke, Virginia, and later killed himself. The man identified as the killer was described in the NY Times as “a fired television reporter with a history of conflicts at work and rage,” and “a black, gay man.” The NY Times described the shooting victims as “Ms. Parker, 24, a reporter, and Mr. Ward, 27, a cameraman, both white,” and reported that the killer had sent a “rambling fax message” to ABC News that “spoke of a race war.” The Associated Press reported that the ATF says the killer bought the gun legally. The Roanoke Times reported that according to the ATF the killer “legally purchased a Glock 9 mm pistol nearly two months before he used it to kill two former colleagues” and that the killer had passed a background check for the purchase. The Huffington Post reported that the killer “was written up in November 2012 for wearing a Barack Obama sticker” by his employer, WDBJ [Roanoke, VA], where the killer was working “as a multimedia journalist/general assignment reporter.”

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn Post to Reddit

Posted by at 05:00 | Posted in 2nd Amendment, Gun Control | 10 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • GObill sizemore

    Tougher sentences have always been the best solution to the murder problem, but tougher sentences are the choice of last resort for liberal judges, which in Oregon means most judges. Liberal judges will only impose tough sentences for poor defendants with less than perfect upbringings when they are given no other choice. The liberal philosophy of criminal justice dictates that the defendants themselves are victims of the system, including government institutions and environmental influences that have poorly shaped them. Therefore, most criminals only need to be reformed or reeducated to be safely returned to society.
    Individual responsibility and acknowledging the existence of evil are foreign concepts to liberalism. It is only in the rarest of circumstances, usually ones involving what they fondly call hate crimes, that a liberal judge will “throw the book at ’em.” Otherwise they would, given the choice, hang the gun and let the murderer off with a few years behind bars, just long enough to be “reformed.”
    Several years ago I read a study that showed that nationwide the average sentence for first degree murder was 38 months if the defendant was white and 42 months if he or she was black. Liberal judges and parole boards, appointed by liberal politicians, had succeeded in placing a pretty cheap price on a human life. It is no wonder that voters, when given the opportunity, have taken sentencing decisions away from judges and imposed minimum mandatory sentences.
    At any rate, thanks for compiling the above list of cases to illustrate the problem with trying to prevent bad guys from obtaining weapons. Violent people wishing to carry out their evil desires have always found weapons, whether they be knives, axes, baseball bats, or poison. Given that reality, making it hard for decent folks to protect themselves seems the height of foolishness.

    • Ron Glynn

      If you are speaking about Oregon, you are way behind the times. A conviction for Murder calls for a minimum sentence of 25 years. Also, Oregon has Sentencing Guidelines for felonies which means judges have very little latitude in sentencing. Also, Oregon Voters passed Measure 11 which calls for mandatory minimum prison sentences for serious person to person crimes.

      • GObill sizemore

        Sorry Ron, I am fully aware of Oregon’s 25-sentence for murder. I thought that was apparent by my comment. However, Oregon’s minimum mandatory sentence had to be forced down the courts’ throats by initiative petition, which was my point..

    • conservativley speaking

      Separated by vast amounts of wealth sited, still Bill Sizemore and Donald Trump speak with common sense eloquence wherein the GOP seeks but cannot seemingly unilaterally pull an countering howitzer blast back while senile under withering fire assaulting US from a [Bastogne] perimeter of Nazionale Socialists’ perimeter’s firing at will on US, 24/7.

  • Dan Mac

    Where’s the outrage over the “massacre” of five people in Oklahoma last week? Or the recent Modessto, California “rampage” killing of five more, including three children? How about the five girls “mowed down” in Long Island? Why isn’t the media crying out for new laws to stop this “epidemic” of “carnage”? It’s quite simple really. NO GUNS WERE INVOLVED! The liberal media, and their liberal Democrat political allies, only chooses to exploit mass killings if it suits their agenda.

    • Common Sense Cast McCall

      You got that right. Thank you!

    • guest444555

      you worthless parasite.

      John Russell “Rusty” Houser — the gunman in Thursday’s movie theater shooting
      — quietly arrived in Lafayette, Louisiana, this month, a 59-year-old
      man with a string of arrests and a record of “extreme erratic behavior,”
      according to court documents. He’d been evicted from his house the
      previous year.

      He also left an online record of far-right, anti-government ideas that alarmed the Southern Poverty Law Center.Houser
      praised Hitler for his “pragmatism” and lauded former Ku Klux Klan
      leader David Duke and the Westboro Baptist Church, among others, the
      SPLC website said

      • Dan Mac

        LMAO! You posted three times, on three different sites, under two different names. Good for you!
        I looked up the words “worthless”, “parasite”, and then “useless parasite” in the dictionary, and, in all cases, it told me to “also see guest444555”.
        Now why would it do that?

        • guest444555

          two different names? are you on drugs? Blow your brains out you worthless parasite.

          • Dan Mac

            Do you even possess a brain?

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)