Big government seeks to replace private retirement industry

Sen Doug Whitsett

by Sen. Doug Whitsett

The recent Democratic presidential debate confirmed long-held suspicions regarding that Party’s apparent antipathy towards the free market principles upon which this great nation was founded. Regrettably, Oregon’s self-styled “progressive” leadership has been all too eager to be at the forefront of many of these failed big government policies. They appear to particularly favor programs that attempt to eliminate the private sector and impose government-sanctioned monopolies by force and edict.

Perhaps the most salient example of this interference with private sector industry was the 2010 passage of the controversial Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, commonly known as “Obamacare.” Democrats in the U.S. House and Senate eagerly voted to enact the 1000-plus page bill on a strict party-line vote.

Most Americans would consider it unconscionable for their elected representative to knowingly and deliberately vote to enact a law without learning how it will affect their constituents. Yet many Congressional Democrats voted to enact the law that affects roughly one-fifth of the country’s economy without reading it. Then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) famously stated that “we have to pass the bill so that you can see what is in it.”

Oregon was first in line for this grandiose experiment. It wasted a monstrous $300 million on a website for the state health care exchange that made our state a national laughingstock.

The website admittedly never signed-up a single person for private insurance coverage. The combined cost of replacing the failed website to sign-up private sector and Medicaid participants will cost in excess of $100 million more.

But the worst impacts of this folly are yet to be felt by our state’s taxpayers. When the Legislature convenes for its 2017 session, the Oregon Health Authority will face tremendous budgetary shortfalls in the cash needed to fund the enormous Medicaid expansion made possible through the Affordable Care Act. Although federal funds have thus far bolstered the system, that funding will be gradually phased out starting next year. Oregonians will be required to make up the difference, and to say the least, it will be costly.

Having already intruded into health care, progressive Democrats at the state and federal level are now hoping to do the same with regards to private retirement savings.

A recent Wall Street Journal editorial details a new rule being promoted by the U.S. Department of Labor that “could more than double the cost of investment advice for many savers.” Under the new rule, savers rolling money from a 401K system into an Individual Retirement Account could only be advised by people acting in their “best interests” as fiduciaries. The addition of seemingly simple words can create significant changes.

Brokers are currently paid on commission while fiduciaries receive a fixed percentage of their clients’ assets. The commission model generally costs consumers about 0.5 percent of their assets while the fee-based approach generally takes around 1.1 percent, in addition to other fund expenses. What this means in plain language is the model being sought by President Obama will cost investors more than twice as much and will also deprive them of many of the options they currently enjoy under the existing system.

Obama called on the Labor Department to propose the rules by the end of the year, in a speech made last July to the White House Conference of Aging. The rule is being created under the auspices of providing a clear path forward for states to create retirement savings programs. Several states, including Oregon, have passed legislation to do exactly that.

Oregon once again appears to have volunteered to be a testing ground for a risky federal concept that may have unintended consequences for the same people it purportedly is aimed at helping. Moreover, it appears to be overtly attempting to supplant the state’s private sector retirement savings industry with a state government-operated monopoly.

The Wall Street Journal editorial states that the proposed Labor Department rule will ultimately end up “harming a law-abiding industry, making services more costly to the consumers it claims to be helping, and then encouraging them to become dependent on government programs that create new risks for taxpayers.” It also states that the Department will place the newfound fiduciary burden created by its policy changes on private competitors, and that Obama is helping state governments “grab a share of this market.”

In a previous column, I warned about the potential pitfalls of this concept and shared concerns about the true motivations of its proponents. Having already placed the health care industry in the controlling clutches of big government, liberal Democrats are attempting to do the same with the nation’s energy sector, under the guise of saving the environment. They are now working to add private retirement to the list of industries that the State will regulate out of existence and replace with another government-sanctioned monopoly.

Our next presidential election is just over a year away. Americans will decide if the eight years of disastrous economic policies pursued by the Obama administration should continue, or be replaced with free market principles. My hope is that we choose wisely, before we run out of industries for “progressive” liberals to take over through more big government mandates.

Senator Doug Whitsett is the Republican state senator representing Senate District 28 – Klamath Falls

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn Post to Reddit

Posted by at 05:00 | Posted in Cover Oregon, Economy, Government Overreach | 8 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • thevillageidiot

    “Obama called on the Labor Department to propose the rules by the end of the year, in a speech made last July to the White House Conference of Aging. The rule is being created under the auspices of providing a clear path forward for states to create retirement savings programs. Several states, including Oregon, have passed legislation to do exactly that.” This is the first step toward the government either state or federal to be able to confiscate private retirement for government purposes by legislating the “private” retirement accounts be made “public” retirement accounts administered by the state or fed. this will be to “balance” the budget. This has already happened in other parts of the world. people can save with out the government. People have been saving for centuries without the government. the current mindless thought process is spend everything now because there is social security to live on in old age. everyone has for gotten that it is supplemental. go look up the historical name. now the state can mandate forced retirement savings. and when the plans go bust guess who is on the hook?

    • bob Clark

      Obama stands for economic regulatory drag. He could really learn a lot from Jimmy Carter who deregulated major industries, such as airlines, natural gas, shipping and railroads; not to mention helping drive telecommunication deregulation (helping grease the skids with such innovation as mass consumed internet services).

      Obummer is much worse than Carter.

  • HBguy

    Why I don’t bother to read Sen. Whitsetts articles anymore.
    Anyone who denies overwhelming scientific studies, including now those produced by Exxon, about climate change because of their political orthodoxy cannot be taken as a serious intellectual. Therefore their opinions are irrelevant.

    • RSVP

      Blow swat or squat monsieur left fling sycophant; gemixt anal0my goring bondage 4/20 psycho-gasmry!

      • HBguy

        Right there is a good example of why the Oregon GOP is in such dire straits.

        • clEric Blair no better

          And HBguy a catch basin for what Appell cider house drools.

    • DavidAppell

      Yes; Senator Doug has lots to say. And he doesn’t even seem to care that much of it is factually false and/or misleading….. He’s just an ideologue who goes along to get along.

  • DavidAppell

    Senator Doug wrote:
    “Having already intruded into health care….”

    Doug, how do you feel about the large health care subsidies given to those who get their health insurance from an employer.

    They don’t have to pay taxes on this benefit, Sen. Doug. That’s worth A LOT of money to them, paid by government.

    Where is your complaint about this?

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)