Smoking and state lottery earnings

by Dan Lucas

I was recently doing some research into the State of Oregon’s quarterly revenue forecasts, and I ran across an interesting statement. In the December 2012 Lottery Earnings Forecast, it says “[Lottery] revenue fell sharply in the wake of the recession and enactment of the smoking ban.” A smoking ban caused lottery revenue to fall? It seemed like a curious comment in an otherwise dry budget document, and so I dug into it a little.

The smoking ban mentioned in the state’s revenue forecast is the Oregon smoking ban expansion that went into effect in January 2009 that prohibited smoking in restaurants, bars and taverns. Anecdotal evidence after the ban spoke of significant loss of lottery revenue because of the ban, noting that video poker had dropped dramatically.

A study cited by the Oregon Lottery in 2009 projected a decline in video lottery revenue of $145 to $270 million a biennium as a result of the smoking ban, a sizable amount. Lottery revenue in the budget coming out of the 2008 special legislative session, before the smoking ban and recession, had been around $1.3 billion. The latest total forecast for lottery revenue is $1.076 billion for the current biennium. The study also noted “we should keep in mind that smoking and gambling tend to go together”, citing a 2006 Oregon Population Survey that showed only 8% of non-smokers play video lottery games — while 25% of smokers play video lottery games.

Any smoking ban impact on video lottery also has a big impact on overall lottery revenues, because video lottery makes up almost 90% of lottery earnings — significantly more than other lottery games like Megabucks, Powerball or Scratch-its. And those video lottery revenues come from a small group of players. A 2010 Oregonian article reported that half of lottery profits from video games come from about 10% of the players, who each lose $500 or more a month.

This quirk of smoking’s relation to lottery revenue underscores the complexity of public policy making. A law intended to help the health of Oregon workers also had the unintended consequence of reducing the state’s lottery revenues, which reduces the amount of state money available for things like schools and parks. It also heightens the unease some Oregonians already have with the lottery in general as a revenue source.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn Post to Reddit

Posted by at 05:00 | Posted in State Budget | 8 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • mike

    Of course the smoking ban reduced lottery sales. Who buys lottery tickets? Poor people who smoke, that’s who.

  • Bob Clark

    Rand Paul suggests marijuana legalization as part of his platform. I don’t think much of marijuana legalization, as marijuana is not called Dope for nothing. But as part of a limited government platform maybe it makes sense, and if government taxes its use like cigarettes; then that’s less tax burden on me, if the limited government platform can limit government spending to safety, roads (might not be a necessary element of government), and court adjudication.

    • DavidAppell

      Shorter Bob Clark: Sure, anything, whatever, who cares — as long as it’s less tax burden on me.

  • formersmoker

    Isn’t the lottery just a pauper tax anyway? It preys on gambling addicts and the poor. Seems like libertarians shouldn’t be crowing about the revenues from lottery to me. Reducing smoking while also reducing lottery addiction seems like a win win

  • Rupert in Springfield

    >This quirk of smoking’s relation to lottery revenue underscores the
    complexity of public policy making. A law intended to help the health of
    Oregon workers also had the unintended consequence of reducing the
    state’s lottery revenues

    Personally I am getting a little tired of side effects that were pointed out while such edicts were under consideration, but ignored, being called unintended consequences.

    With video poker, government preys on compulsive vulnerable people. Wow, who would have thought that when you disallow another compulsive behaviour, smoking, those compulsive people stop coming around?

  • KneeJerk

    So allow pot smoking at video poker terminals. Will increase revenue!

  • Pingback: ccn2785xdnwdc5bwedsj4wsndb()

  • Pingback: 3nvb54wnxd5cbvbecnv5ev75bc()

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)