Attack on People’s Petition Rights Part II

jas capitol2007jan.serendipityThumb Attack on Peoples Petition Rights Part IIThe Taxpayer Association, Bill Sizemore, and the signature gathering entrepreneur company, Democracy Direct, defended the people’s initiative process during the House Election, Ethics and Rules Committee on Jan. 31st. Opponents of the people’s initiative process listed out their laundry list of horrible ideas to make petitioning more difficult.

(1) One year time limit for gathering signatures (A 50% cut)
(2) Raise signature requirement threshold by 20%
(3) Raise number of sponsors to qualify petition to start
(4) Require all ballot measure election complaints (frivolous or not) to be listed in the state voters’ pamphlet (yet not list any election complaints aimed at measure opponents)
(5) Require official legislative blessings for all voter approved measures before they become law
(6) Make chief petitioners liable for what any signature gatherer may do while collecting signatures.

The Taxpayer Association testified that already thousands of legitimate voter signatures are cancelled every year due to legal technicalities. It was disturbing on how the anti-initiative lobby wanted to combat fraud by enacting new laws to club chief petitioners, while the pro-initiative lobby wanted to combat fraud by targeting laws to those who actually commit it fraud.

The new Legislative Majority choosing to start Session by taking away the people’s petition voice is a blow to their populism appeal and a signal that it is business as usual — if not worse — at the State Capitol.

tt twitter big4 Attack on Peoples Petition Rights Part II tt digg big4 Attack on Peoples Petition Rights Part II tt facebook big4 Attack on Peoples Petition Rights Part II tt reddit big4 Attack on Peoples Petition Rights Part II

Posted by at 02:57 | Posted in Measure 37 | 9 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • Jerry

    It is very clear to me that these morons in Salem want to take away the initiative process altogether. I am ashamed to live in this state and have these people “represent” me. They only represent unions and lobbiests. The fools.
    I am deeply troubled by this and only hope that someone wakes up before it is too late. Sadly, Oregon’s lead in representative government is being eroded each and every day by the “politicians” in Salem.
    I am sick and disgusted with all of them.

  • Captain_Anon

    I think our system does need SOME reform. It’s way to easy to get something on the ballot. I’m tired of having ill conceived or thought out measures show up. It’s not uncommon for there to be around 15-20 measures on a ballot, with some of them even being competing measures that cancel each other out.

    • Alan Grosso

      What about the ill conceived legislation that comes out of the state legislature every session?? The peeple’s right to petition should not be touched in any way. It is our only hope to save ourselves from the disaster called politicians. In fact, it should be made easier to pass a ballot measure, not more difficult.

      • Captain_Anon

        there are checks and balances in place in the legislature, such as committees and hearings, which are public and can have public input. additionally, we the people put on conflicting measures all the time. whether its mandates for services without funding sources, or measures that oppose each other (i.e. requiring the state look to alternative transportation options and another measure requiring 90% of transpo budgets be spent on roads) etc etc. and they are so poorly written that many end up in court for years – both measures i agree with and disagree with.

        just because one disagrees with the vast majority in the state and thier proposed and actualized legislation doesn’t mean we should make our system such that any joe schmoe can get thier crazy concocted ideas on the ballot.

  • http://www.nwrepublican.blogspot.com Ted Piccolo

    Captain Anon,
    You have obviously never tried to get anything on the ballot. Because saying it is “way to easy” to get something on the ballot is about an uninformed statement as one can make.

    With the current regulations in place it takes about a half million dollars to get something on the ballot.

    Call that easy?

    Please.

    • Captain_Anon

      Ted, you wrote:
      *You have obviously never tried to get anything on the ballot. Because saying it is “way to easy” to get something on the ballot is about an uninformed statement as one can make.*

      Tell, me, how do you know this? how uninformed of a statement is that since you have no information on which to base that?

      money is easy to come by for political purposes. look at that mike rich guy. if everyone who supported a measure gave 10 bucks, it would only require 5000 people who supported it to donate. and interest groups PACs all give money to causes they support. so that’s not an issue.

      • Dan Meek

        Captain Anon cannot even multiply numbers. 5000 x 10 is 50,000. It is not half a million, as he so adamantly asserts. And he is apparently afraid to identify himself. Doing so would, of course, prove Ted Piccolo correct in his assertion that Captain Anon has never tried to get anything on the ballot. Also, Captain, the guy is not Mike Rich. It is Howard Rich.

        • Captain_anon

          forgive my typo on the 10. is should have read ’100.’ and great, you recognized my point of ‘howard’ rich and knew what i was talking about. the point was made. great!

          and my identity… Captain Anon is just fine, thanks. you don’t need to know who i am. I could tell you i spearheaded a campagin to get a measure on the ballot. but then because you disagree with my viewpoints, you’d probably just say i was lying. so it doesn’t really matter.

  • Jerry

    Who cares if 15 to 20 measures get on the ballot. Can’t you figure them out? Don’t you know how to bubble a circle on a ballot?
    There are no checks and balances that work anymore. The politicians in this state are all equally ineffective. The only remaining check and balance is the initiative/referendum process. To change it is to hurt the people of Oregon. There is no argument that makes any sense to cripple our initiative process. NONE.
    People who say there is are simply lazy. I don’t care if there are 50 ballot measure on the ballot.
    Wake up you fools.

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)