The DNC Convention: One Damned Lie After Another

Right From the Start

Monday’s Wall Street Journal contained an article by L. Gordon Crovitz regarding the new use and abuse of “fact checkers” by the mainstream media. It was a “pox on both your houses” article which broadly condemned the use of “fact checker” opinions as if they were facts themselves. As Mr. Crovitz noted:

“The political season brings out the worst in many, but it’s still surprising that some journalists are reliving the good old days when the media claimed a monopoly on the truth.

* * *

“Reporting as ‘fact checking’ might have started as a check on outright falsehoods, but it has morphed into a technique for supposedly nonpartisan journalists to present opinion as ‘facts.’”

The biases evident in the print, broadcast, cable and talk radio media are well established and widely known and the “fact checkers” each one uses reflect those biases. So if you see something on MSNBC ballyhooing a Democrat statement as “mostly true” it simply means that the spelling was correct regardless of the accuracy of the content.

But there is a difference between a “political lie” – Gov. Mitt Romney was responsible for the death of a former worker at a company owned by Bain – and a “damned lie”

“I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Monica Lewinsky. I never told anybody to lie, not a single time; never.”

Neither is acceptable and our politicians should be held accountable for their proliferation. Unfortunately, political lie seem to have become the nourishment for campaigns and even when the lies is demonstrably false, many politicians refuse to renounce them or apologize for the gaff. Take for instance President Barack Obama’s steadfast refusal to renounce the lie about Mr. Romney’s responsibility for the death of a worker at a company owned by Bain.

To be sure, the Democrats do not have a lock on “political lies” or even “damned lies” but there is something unsettling about a political convention built on a series of “damned lies.” I’m not talking about the reckless or slanderous political oratory repeated regularly by one speaker after another. I’m talking about foundational lies that seek to avoid responsibility for some very real acts.

Let’s start with Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, Mr. Obama’s handpicked head of the Democrat National Committee. It often appears that she was chosen primarily for her ability to bray the party line at a volume that drowns out the interviewer and darkens the skies. Ms. Wasserman-Schultz lacks even a nodding acquaintance with the truth in most everything she says but back-to-back lies regarding the Israeli ambassador set a new high in lows for politicians. First, Phillip Klein of the Washington Examiner reported Ms. Wasserman-Schultz, during a training session to instruct Jewish Democrats how to influence other Jews to vote for Mr. Obama stated,

“We know, and I’ve heard no less than Ambassador Michael Oren say this, that what the Republicans are doing is dangerous for Israel.”

When that quote was reported and attributed to Ms. Wasserman-Schultz, Ambassador Oren denied it emphatically:

“I categorically deny that I ever characterized Republican policies as harmful to Israel. Bipartisan support is a paramount national interest for Israel, and we have great friends on both sides of the aisle.”

When confronted with the denial by Ambassador Oren, Ms. Wasserman-Schultz denied to FOX News that she ever made the statement:

“I didn’t say [Oren] said that.  And unfortunately, that comment was reported by a conservative newspaper. It’s not surprising that they would deliberately misquote me. What I always say is that unfortunately the Republicans have made Israel a political football, which is dangerous for Israel. And Ambassador Oren has said that we can’t ever suggest that there is any daylight between the two parties on Israel because there isn’t. And that that’s harmful to Israel. That’s what I said, and that is accurate.

And when the tape of the actual presentation by Ms. Wasserman-Schultz at the training session confirmed that original quote by Mr. Klein was accurate and that Ms. Wasserman-Schultz was a practiced liar, there was dead silence – silence from Ms. Wasserman-Schultz, silence from Mr. Obama, and silence from the Democrat National Committee.

But that wasn’t the only foundational lie. The Democrat Platform Committee reported out a platform that pointedly changed past Democrat platforms by removing any reference to God and by eliminating a reference to Jerusalem as the capitol of Israel. Ms. Wasserman-Schultz claimed the omissions were a technical oversight but later members of the platform committee stated that the changes were made to reflect the “current position” of the Mr. Obama’s administration and that Mr. Obama had reviewed and personally approved the platform before its presentation to the convention. It was only after the firestorm erupted that the White House asserted that Mr. Obama personally intervened to restore the omitted sections regarding God and Jerusalem.

Then came the lie about the “big event” – Mr. Obama’s acceptance speech on Thursday evening. In an attempt to re-create the adoration event of Mr. Obama’s first ascendancy at the Denver convention in 2008, Mr. Obama’s team had arranged to use the 74,000 seat Bank of America football stadium – home of the Carolina Panthers. The organizers intended to bus in people from Atlanta and other Southern cities to fill the stadium. But when enthusiasm for attendance at Mr. Obama’s next coronation waned, organizers were forced to return to the smaller Time Warner Arena. Mr. Obama’s White House claimed that change was due to inclement weather. But at the time of that pronouncement meteorologists were reporting clearing weather with minor chances of rain and, in fact, on Thursday the evening broke warm (in the mid-seventies) and clear skies – ideal conditions for a crowd that would not gather to honor Mr. Obama.

And finally, add to that the lies of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) that Mr. Romney deliberately invited boos at the NAACP convention to incite racial tensions and Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid’s assertion that Mr.Romney did not pay taxes for ten years and you can justifiably conclude that the national leadership of the Democrat party will lie even when the truth would serve them better, or that lying without accountability has become so regular that they are no longer able to distinguish between the truth and a lie.

Dis regard President John F. Kennedy’s admonitions about “the best and the brightest” these Democrats have devolved into “liars and scoundrels.”

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn Post to Reddit

Posted by at 05:00 | Posted in 2012 Presidential Election, Mitt Romney, President Obama | 6 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • Rupert in Springfield

    Very funny article. It does raise some good points, however I do think this idea that political conventions should be free from lies is kind of silly. It’s a political convention, not a documentary. If you go looking for truth at a political convention you are looking in the wrong place.

    The point about news media “fact checkers” being the new way to insert opinion into something and pretend its news is a good one. There can often be a lot of bias in what facts are checked and how they are compared.

    However the real story with the Democrats convention was the very disturbing turn on Israel. If we give the Democrats the benefit of the doubt and assume it was total incompetence, rather than a deliberate message to Iran, it is still scary as hell. Four years into an administration that has gone out of their way to offend Israel in as public a way as possible makes this sort of mistake really inexcusable.

    To lead into the Jerusalem vote with a very public shunning of the Israelis in upcoming military exercises is bad. To follow it up with the presidents refusal to meet with Israels PM next month is unforgivable.

    Our best hope is that Mr. Obama simply needed more time on the golf course or a few last spins in Air Force one in case he loses in November. The other alternative – that Israel is being as publicly distanced from the US as humanly possible in order to send a clear signal to Iran is really scary.

    My opinion is it is the latter. Mr. Obama is many things, but no one could possibly be this incompetent. It is impossible to believe that Obama, or a six year old child, could miss the clear signals our treatment of Israel sends at a time when an Israeli attack on Iran, and an ensuing war, is as eminent as it appears to be. When you have time to go on Letterman, but not time to meet with the Israeli PM, that says it all.

    In my opinion this was the big story of the convention. Our foreign policy is an absolute disaster. The killing of our ambassador in Libya leaves many wondering if we backed the wrong side in our recent overthrow of that countries government. The situation in Egypt is not a whole lot better. Why is it this administration seems to have a real record of supporting those who don’t seem all that supportive of us? Do we really need to add rejection of Israel, our one constant friend in the region, to this string of disasters? From his actions, it would appear that Obama’s answer would be a resounding “yes”.

  • valley person

    Larry Huss…one damn inane commentary after another….

    • convservatively speakingf

      vp, take your dem pitch’n to the blueoregon kitch’n. Who knows, maybe your yeast infection will find some snort or leaven there.

  • Judahlevi

    Fact-checking was always a liberal ploy created by journalists who have the audacity to believe that only they know the “truth” about everything. No one knows the “truth” about everything.
    When it comes to politics, it is almost 100% opinion, not facts. Even if facts are used, it is an individual’s opinion as to how they are interpreted – half full or half empty.
    This was always a joke to begin with.

    • 3H

      Facts where “created” by liberals to confuse and annoy conservatives who find them a hinderance. 😉

      However, I will keep in mind that your musings are not based on facts and are most likely simply almost 100% opinion.,

      • valley person

        Or, when the facts aren’t on your side, ignore tham and find different facts.

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)