How often do Oregon congressional districts flip?

by Dr. Eric Ostermeier (Smart Politics)

The opposing party has gained control of just 27 U.S. House districts in state history, or 11 percent of the time; Oregon is in the midst of its second-longest partisan turnover dry spell

Suzanne Bonamici’s 14-point victory over Republican Rob Cornilles in Oregon’s 1st Congressional District special election on Tuesday raised few eyebrows, considering the Democratic Party’s hold on the district for two generations.

Despite the bizarre and sensationalistic aspects leading to seven-term David Wu’s resignation last year, the west coast district did not generate the publicity (or competitiveness) as Anthony Weiner’s scandal and departure did in the big media market of NY-09. (Though the districts are nearly as competitive: OR-01 has a DEM +8 Partisan Voting Index while NY-09 has a DEM +5).

And how frequently have Oregon’s congressional districts switched parties over the years?

A Smart Politics study of Oregon’s nearly 250 U.S. House elections since statehood finds that party control has flipped just 11 percent of the time.

There have been 248 general and special U.S. House elections in the Beaver State.

Five of these district elections did not introduce an incumbent party to the process when they were on the ballot for the first time (one for each district): the state’s at-large district created in 1859, the 2nd CD in 1892, the 3rd CD in 1912, the 4th CD in 1942, and the 5th CD in 1982.

Of these 243 elections, just 27 saw a change in partisan control, or an 11.1 percent takeover rate – with no difference among the two major parties.

Democrats have been able to pick off 15 of the 133 Republican-held districts over the decades, or 11.3 percent, while the GOP has picked up 12 of the 110 Democratic-held districts, or a nearly identical 10.9 percent success rate.

Special elections, like the one conducted Tuesday, have not proven to be any more competitive overall.

Oregon has held 10 special election contests since statehood – including Bonamici’s win this week – and just one has resulted in partisan turnover of the seat, for a 10 percent flip rate.

That one instance took place over 135 years ago.

In 1873, Democrat James Nesmith won a 14-point victory in the state’s at-large congressional district.

Republicans had been in power for less than four months when their representative, Joseph Wilson, died in office.

But while special elections per se have not seen an increase in flipping of partisan control of Oregon House seats, open seats in general have.

Open seats have flipped at nearly three times the rate (22.4 percent) as those with an incumbent on the ballot (8.2 percent) over the last 150+ years.

There has been partisan turnover in 11 of 49 open seat Beaver State U.S. House districts compared to just 16 of 194 races with incumbents.

Rate of Partisan Takeover of Oregon U.S. House Seats by Type of Election

Race
Flipped
Did not flip
% Flip
Open
11
38
22.4
Incumbent
16
178
8.2
Total
27
216
11.1

Note: An additional two U.S. House members ran – and won – in newly created districts after reapportionment in 1912 (Abraham Lafferty, from the 2nd to the 3rd CD) and 1982 (Denny Smith, from the 2nd to the 5th CD). Includes general and special elections. Data compiled by Smart Politics.

Oregon is currently in a stretch of 36 consecutive U.S. House elections without the flipping of a seat, dating back through the 1998 cycle – the second longest such streak in state history.

The last seat to flip occurred in 1996 when Republican incumbent Jim Bunn lost to Democrat Darlene Hooley.

The longest period without partisan takeover of an Oregon U.S. House seat occurred from 1882 through 1920, when Republicans held serve for 41 consecutive races.

Smart Politics is the non-partisan political news site authored by Dr. Eric Ostermeier at the University of Minnesota’s Humphrey School of Public Affairs.

 

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn Post to Reddit

Posted by at 06:20 | Posted in Congressional Races, Rep. David Wu | 529 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • Bob Clark

    I suspect “independents” in Oregon are largely sympathic to the Democrat Party agenda.  I heard that in this CD#1 election, Bonamici’s name appeared twice on the ballot:  once for the Democrat nomination, and another for the “Independent” nomination.  I thought at the time this gave Bonamici an artificial optic type of advantage as possibly the naive voter who just “showed up” when opening his/her ballot might have been swayed additionally by Bonamici’s double appearance on the ballot.

    I don’t know if this is true since I am not in CD#1, so as to have not received this ballot.  But if this were the case, I might imagine a party launching several different parties (breaking itself up) to garner more entries for a candidate on the ballot.  Bizzaro.  Now I can just hear someone saying, “see, we need fusion voting or some variant thereof” (where like the top two primary finishers run in the general regardless of party.  I say yuck to that as we need a diversity of idealogy in the general to maintain choice).

  • Rupert in Springfield

    > the west coast district did not generate the publicity (or competitiveness) as Anthony Weiner’s scandal

    Wu’s scandal was arguably more newsworthy than the Weiner scandal. But Weiner was NYC, Wu was not and that made all the difference. Had Wu been a Republican doing the tiger suit thing, then yes, naturally it would have gotten far more coverage than it did. Either way, you have a heavily Democratic town with Democrats heavily outspending Republicans in a race that was far more crucial to the Dems than Reps. 

    Not exactly a big surprise for the Bonjourno victory even in a time where takeovers by Republicans in elections generally have been at historic highs.

    The result? A lateral move where Oregon essentially relelects another tax and spend liberal to congress.

    The downside is at least Wu was fairly incompetent and had a tenancy to just hang out and collect a pay check, he didn’t actually do much of anything. Let us hope that BonVoyage does the same thing.

  • Paul

    Bonamici’s name did not appear twice.  What happened is that Bonamici’s name appeared, and then both “Democrat Party” and “Independent Party” appeared.  

  • SpyVspy

    I suspect fraud at the ballot box along with all the dumb people who vote for liberals who are destroying our fine state.

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)