You’re invited: Crash course on Cuba, Iraq

iraq-flag

Speaker: Jason Williams
Oregon Executive Club Speaker Series
Wed. Jan 6th, 7:00pm
Optional dinner $20

Portland Airport Shilo Inn

Jason Williams, Founder of the Taxpayer Association of Oregon, visited Cuba and Iraq in 2015 on charity short-term mission trips.   In Iraq, Jason was able to meet and serve refugees who were hunted down by ISIS for extermination.   Both Cuba and Iraq are at the center of the nation’s top foreign policy debates.  

Jason will be sharing both political, sociological, cultural, religious and topical news items on these countries from the view of being on the inside.   The issues of the Cuban embargo, human rights, refugees, ISIS and the war on terror in the Middle East are critical issues we need to know more about.

The Stores from the Iraqi refugees were powerful and disturbing

iraq42

— Learn about what life is like for refugees

iraq-jas-homes

— Learn about what is going on in Cuba 

cuba-che

Inside homes converted to churches, once banned by the government, now thrive in Cuba

cuba-church

It wouldn’t Cuba without the propaganda signs everywhere (private business signs outlawed)

cuba-sign

Learn so much in just one evening…Wed. Jan 6th, Portland Airport Shilo

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn Post to Reddit

Posted by at 04:55 | Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • Bob Clark

    Fantastic. I know Jason came out against the Donald when the Donald advocated for a ban on new Muslim immigration from the Middle East. Given our presidential choices, though, I’ve still got to go with the Donald or Cruz (although the latter has some rather bad ideas about the need for a central bank/Federal Reserve).

  • This should be a very interesting Executive Club event with Jason’s insights on Iraq and Cuba, and a legislative update so we know what’s headed our way in February.. If you haven’t attended before, optional dinner is available at 6:30pm and the program begins at 7pm. See you there.

  • ed johnston

    traitor’s

    No wonder Gov. Kate Brown wants to punish the whistle blowers …

    oregoncatalyst.com/30045-gov-kate-brown-punish-whistle…

    Cached

    A few days ago we reported on Gov. Kate Brown’s chilling moves to … “Emails that former Gov. John Kitzhaber tried to have deleted … and Ed Johnston

    • ed

      Contribution’s are worth more then Lawful Americans lives,

      Edward Johnston – Please call him John…

      http://www.facebook.com/edward.johnston.3150/posts/...

      Please call him John kitzharber..Fax:this to (503) 378-6827. Duly verified Deceleration of facts. Man to Man. John kitzharber.. I would like to know why our Elected …

    • ed

      my bad it finally showed up,,, please for give me being ,, non patient . please read my filings on the City county and state , I emailed this lawful American facts to the editor , please pass on to our Friend ion the corner of the yellow ribbon on his tree on his land you know, Lincoln County Jail tried to kill then the last time I believed poisoned me august 2014 their medical facts. but all being covered up.

  • ed johnston

    Published Disclaimer: a man, Lawful American Bloodline Edward-Malone: Johnston U.C.C. 1-308 All Rights Reserved: (Rev. 10 12/2014)https://www.youtube.com/watch…

    Edward-Malone: Johnston U.C.C. 1-308 All Rights Reserved: (Rev. 10 12/2014)
    Disclaimer: man, edward-malone johnston , non-corporate entity reserve the right to amend or make further corrections to this document as further information becomes available. Furthermore, I do not agree to any Civil and or Criminal Penalties whereas documents taken from Congressional Record, IRS Code, Farm Bills, Trading With the Enemies Act, Legislative Procedures Act, Court rulings and decisions and the Bankruptcy Acts – now 4 – of these United States, et al and Birth Record Fraud Scheme, Bond, C.U.S.I.P., Commodities Fraud, Theft of and or misuse of CESTA QUE VIE TRUST, AKA, ONE PEOPLES PUBLIC TRUST ACCOUNTS which were to be established so the men and women could pay their debts as all lawful money was stolen from us, treason against the Constitution, by Roosevelt and his coconspirators AKA the Vatican, British Empire, International Bankers, et al. The FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE a debt instrument merely discharges the debt, Breach of Public Trust and Misprision by the Congress of the United States, AKA federal employees, Fiduciary Trustees, in dealing with the Bankruptcy Act(s) of 1933 and acts of TREASON by Franklin D. Roosevelt, Congress and the Receivers of the Bankruptcies. 1779 without amendment the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, dba, CORPORATION, a French Corporation – Congress has refused to provide names of the 3 parties who formed this Corporation – an act of treason. (28 U.S.C. @ 3002 Definitions 15) United States means A) a Federal Corporation – de facto government. Between March 3 – 5 1861 12 States walked out of Congress in Secession, see Rulings of the Attorney General B. J. Black published 1863, and Congress was forced to adjourn Without Day; became Sin Die, never to meet again, the next day as they did not have enough votes to call the next session – see Congressional Record March 5 – July 15, 1861. Every Legislative Act since is fraud in the inducement. Welcome to the Dictatorship – de facto Government. It should be herein noted that in the 1933 Bankruptcy Act all Offices, Agencies and Departments were turned over to the Receivers, unknown, of the Bankruptcy, via the United Nations – 12 years before that became and Organization, and All Law and Statutes became international law and copy written AKA Lawless America. Any nation once bankrupt is no longer sovereign. Are you practicing Corporate Policy instead of law? Prove it. Also read the 16th American Jurist prudence, Second Edition, Section 177…any law written in violation of this Constitution is as though it were never written and no one is obligated to obey it…….; massive voter fraud.
    NOTICE: The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS A CROWN/VATICAN/SWISS BANK Property the result of land theft by the Pope from the Great Marzocco. ( A fraud scheme the result of the 1933 ;Bankruptcy Act & G5. Trustees Are: The Pope, British Monarch, U.S. Postmaster See 28 U.S.C. @ 3002 Definitions 15) United States means A) a Federal Corporation. AKA French.
    Now consider the beginning of the Court Fraud Scheme and the establishment of the Court system AKA Renaissance whereas the CATHOLIC CULT AKA CHURCH via 4-Popes, AKA, Jesuits, and bought into the Courts and Royalty and remain to this day controlling the Judicial system, AKA, the Bank. The Court case number is the Account number from which the Court, aka, Bank is running their Bond, C.U.S.I.P. , and commodities fraud scheme against all defendants, pro se, and private man/woman litigants who enter thereof. It is a Ponzi Scheme. Show me your conflict of interest statement(s). Contracting in violation of uberrimae fidei – of utmost good faith and uberrima Fideas – utmost good faith. (Ref. BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 8th EDITION pg. 1558.) No court papers are disclosing as a contract; Nor have a proper identity from the OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET (OMB NUMBER), fail to provide their Commodities license information nor their Bonding information nor the C.U.S.I.P.: (CUSIP stands for Committee on Uniform Securities Identification Procedures. Formed in 1962, this committee developed a system (implemented in 1967) that identifies securities, specifically U.S. and Canadian registered stocks, and U.S. government and municipal bonds.) Now show me your conflict of interest statement(s).

    SMITH v. CITY OF CUMMING – FindLaw – Findlaw: Cases and Codes

    caselaw.findlaw.com/us-11th-circuit/1418743.html

    FindLaw provides SMITH v. CITY OF CUMMING, No … that they had a First Amendment right, … a “First Amendment right to film matters of public

    Information in the nature of a quo warranto. A proceeding against the usurper of a franchise or office. Jarman v. Ma…son, 102 Okl. 278, 229 P. 459, 460.; An extraordinary proceeding, prerogative in nature, addressed to preventing a continued exercise of authority unlawfully asserted. Johnson v. Manhattan Ry. Co., N.Y., 53 S.Ct. 721, 289 U.S. 479, 77 L.Ed. 1331. watch the Video at http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/

    My RIGHT OF DEFENSE AGAINST UNLAWFUL ARREST

    Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting
    officer’s life if necessary.î Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This
    premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the
    case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: ìWhere the
    officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally
    accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with
    very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right
    to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What
    may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter
    in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been
    committed.î

    An arrest made with a defective warrant, or one issued without
    affidavit, or one that fails to allege a crime is within jurisdiction,
    and one who is being arrested, may resist arrest and break away. lf the
    arresting officer is killed by one who is so resisting, the killing will
    be no more than an involuntary manslaughter.î Housh v. People, 75 111.
    491; reaffirmed and quoted in State v. Leach, 7 Conn. 452; State v.
    Gleason, 32 Kan. 245; Ballard v. State, 43 Ohio 349; State v Rousseau,
    241 P. 2d 447; State v. Spaulding, 34 Minn. 3621.

    When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right
    to be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by
    force, and if, in the reasonable exercise of his right of self defense,
    his assailant is killed, he is justified.î Runyan v. State, 57 Ind. 80;
    Miller v. State, 74 Ind. 1.

    These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an
    arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by
    the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private
    individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence.î Jones v. State,
    26 Tex. App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State,
    43 Tex. 93, 903.

    An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to
    be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in
    defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and
    battery.î (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).

    Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case,
    the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer
    and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense.î (State v.
    Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).

    One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as
    he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus
    it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an
    officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without
    resistance.î (Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).

    Story affirmed the right of self-defense by persons held illegally. In
    his own writings, he had admitted that ëa situation could arise in which
    the checks-and-balances principle ceased to work and the various
    branches of government concurred in a gross usurpation.í There would be
    no usual remedy by changing the law or passing an amendment to the
    Constitution, should the oppressed party be a minority. Story concluded,
    ëIf there be any remedy at all … it is a remedy never provided for by
    human institutions.í That was the ëultimate right of all human beings in
    extreme cases to resist oppression, and to apply force against ruinous
    injustice.íî (From Mutiny on the Amistad by Howard Jones, Oxford
    University Press, 1987, an account of the reading of the decision in the
    case by Justice Joseph Story of the Supreme Court.

    As for grounds for arrest: ìThe carrying of arms in a quiet, peaceable,
    and orderly manner, concealed on or about the person, is not a breach of
    the peace. Nor does such an act of itself, lead to a breach of the
    peace.î (Whartonís Criminal and Civil Procedure, 12th Ed., Vol.2: Judy
    v. Lashley, 5 W. Va. 628, 41 S.E. 197)

    My case rests to be true thereof:

    Thereof:

    __Autograph on file _________________________________________Seal____________
    a living , breathing , man, edward -malone: johnston (non-corporation)

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)