Lessons From the Alabama Senate Race

“The Democratic Senator from Alabama” is a strange thing to hear in the 21st century.  Since Jeff Sessions original election to the Senate in 1996, the United State’s Senate delegation from Alabama has been very reliably Republican. But that all changed the other night in the wake of the Alabama special election, when Democrat Doug Jones eeked out a victory over Republican Roy Moore.  So what can Republicans learn from this very very strange election?  Here are a few takeaways.

Democrats are more energized than Republicans right now.  We saw it in the Virginia Gubernatorial election, but now it rings even truer: the Democratic base is energized, and Republicans ignore that at their own risk.  Doug Jones and the Democrats were able to take advantage of the low turnout that occurs during special elections.  The percentage of voters who were African American in this special election rivaled that of when Barack Obama was on the ballot, a number that we saw dip in 2016 when Hillary Clinton was on the top of the ticket, a very impressive feat for Democrats and the Moore campaign.

Candidates matter.  Roy Moore had more than his fair share of baggage that has been discussed and debated more than enough everywhere else, so we don’t need to discuss it here.  Enough Alabama voters believed the accusations against Moore that he was able to lose a race that virtually any other serious Republican would have won walking away.  Maybe Moore would have even been successful during a general election with higher turnout, but we shouldn’t act surprised that many voters in Alabama were not highly motivated to get to a polling place and vote for this man.  Sometimes you bet on the wrong horse and when you do there are consequences, unfortunately, this time it cost Republicans a Senate seat.  It is the responsibility of candidates to earn votes from their constituents, a political party is not entitled to those votes even in a state as red as Alabama.  In order to win we should strive to also be worthy of winning.

It is probably an isolated incident.  Democrats are running around on the media circuit now trying to make more out of this victory than it likely was.  Time and time again news commentators attempted to paint this race as a referendum on Donald Trump and his policies, but I am not buying it.  Yes, Democrats are more energized, much like Republicans were during the 2010 special election to replace Ted Kennedy in the Senate when Republican Scott Brown was able to win a Senate seat in Massachusetts.  As I said earlier Republicans should ignore that momentum at their own risk, but this was a local election where the big thing at issue was the accusation against Roy Moore. Reading something more into that might be smart politics, but to pretend that the perfect storm that led to Senator Doug Jones is indicative of a massive blue wave that could take out even Senators like Ted Cruz, as some in the media are now suggesting seems like a bit of a stretch to me.

With an even narrower margin in the Senate, the Trump agenda is now very reliant on Senators like John McCain, Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Rand Paul, and others playing ball.  That could present some real problems on major legislation, but I am not convinced that in the long run, Roy Moore’s loss could end up being a good thing.  Saving the country from a drawn-out ethics investigation that would be broadcast wall to wall in the run-up to the 2018 elections seems like a positive to me.  Democrats would certainly like to get every sitting Republican on record for where they stood on Roy Moore expulsion and their messaging would attempt to make Roy Moore the Republican Party’s new hood ornament.  While this loss hurts, it should be a wakeup call to Republicans everywhere.  Be worthy of winning, or face the consequences.


Jacob Vandever is political activist, lifelong Oregonian, and proud Oregon State graduate. Jacob is the Editor of the Oregon Upstart Blog.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn Post to Reddit

Posted by at 09:15 | Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments |Email This Post Email This Post |Print This Post Print This Post
  • Oregon Engineer

    So what. you could have a Republican controlled house and senate for the next 20 years and nothing would change. They all buy votes. under a republician controlled senate and house look at the lame “tax reform”. are you going to see very much more in your net income? probably not. it will be eaten up by the in,creased insurance premiums for Obamacare. Did they lower the tax rates for the rest of us? No. did they increase taxes on the rest of us? yes in the form of reduced deductions. Did they prevent an increase in the debt? no. they let it increase? did they actually reduce spending to a level lower than last year? No. Did they eliminate Obamacare? No. did they even make any changes the rest of us could see? No. even the removal of the stupid mandatory purchase would have been something but again No. So tell me one more time what difference does the loss of a Republican senator mean? I suppose the excuse is that the party is just not fired up enough or enough votes or enough intestinal fortitude to do any thing for their constituency. Well maybe they did for all the major donors to the party and campaign coffers. to quote George Carlin it is a club and you ain’t in it. I am registered as republican but I am not one nor democrat.

    • Granola girl

      Do you realize that the tax reform is not complete as of yet? Why dont we wait and see what the final draft is before jumping off the cliff which is what Libs lovvve to do.

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Catalyst through daily email updates:

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)